Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

SEC Considering Petition to Adopt Rules Requiring Disclosure of Political Contributions

By Gustav L. Schmidt on September 14, 2011
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The SEC is currently considering a petition submitted by a group of 10 law professors asking the SEC to adopt rules that would require public reporting companies to disclose political contributions in their annual proxy statements. As justification for the proposal, the petitioners assert that there is empirical evidence that indicates public company shareholders are becoming more and more interested in receiving disclosure of corporate political contributions. Moreover, the petitioners further support their proposal by pointing out that the U.S. Supreme Court has regularly recognized and relied on corporate accountability mechanisms in instances where shareholder resources are used for political purposes. Specifically, in the recent landmark case of Citizens United v. FEC, the Court recognized certain protected corporate speech, effectively extending constitutional protections under the First Amendment to independent corporate political spending. In its opinion, the Court relied on “procedures of corporate democracy” as a means by which shareholders could monitor the use of corporate assets for political purposes and also effect corporate change where such political purposes were inconsistent with shareholder interests. The petitioners point out, however, that in order for corporate democracy to be effective, shareholders must have information about a company’s political speech; otherwise, shareholders are unable to know whether such speech “advances the corporation’s interest in making profits.” Therefore, the petitioners conclude that political contribution disclosure rules are necessary in order for these accountability mechanisms and corporate democracy to function properly and efficiently.

A copy of the petition can be viewed on the SEC’s website by clicking here. While the SEC has not indicated whether it will take any further action in response to the petition, it is accepting public comments regarding the proposal. The public comments that the SEC has received to date are also posted on its website and can be viewed by clicking here. We believe that given the controversy of the Citizens United case, the SEC may give this petition strong consideration.

Photo of Gustav L. Schmidt Gustav L. Schmidt

Gustav Schmidt is a member of Gunster’s Banking & Financial Services and Securities and Corporate Governance Practice Groups.  He regularly advises public and private companies on matters involving securities and banking laws and regulations, compliance with national securities exchange rules, corporate governance issues…

Gustav Schmidt is a member of Gunster’s Banking & Financial Services and Securities and Corporate Governance Practice Groups.  He regularly advises public and private companies on matters involving securities and banking laws and regulations, compliance with national securities exchange rules, corporate governance issues and practices, M&A transactions, capital raising transactions, and general corporate law issues.

Read more about Gustav L. SchmidtEmailGustav's Twitter Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Corporate Governance and Compliance
  • Blog:
    The Securities Edge
  • Organization:
    Gunster
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo