Ashley-Anne L. Criss

Firm/Organization: Wiley Rein LLP

Latest Articles

CEO’s Abuse of Position is Not “Professional Services” and Negligence Claim for Return of Monies Does Not Seek “Damages”

October 30, 2019

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas has held that no coverage exists under an errors and omissions policy for claims arising out of the misappropriation and conversion of funds by an insured’s chief executive officer. Kerr v. Gotham Ins. Co., 2019 WL 5268625 (E.D. Ark. Oct. 17, 2019). The court held that the CEO’s conduct did not constitute the rendering of professional services and that the damages, despite arising from…

Executive Summary Blog

Third Circuit Finds Major Shareholder Exclusion Ambiguous as Applied to Company Acquiring All of Insured’s Stock after Policy Period

By Ashley-Anne L. Criss

October 18, 2019

The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, applying Delaware law, has held that a D&O policy’s Major Shareholder Exclusion, barring claims brought against the insured entity by a company owning five percent or more of the entity, was ambiguous as applied to a company acquiring one hundred percent of the insured’s stock after the policy period. EMSI Acquisition, Inc. v. RSUI Indem. Co., 2019 WL 4511948 (3d Cir. Sept. 19, 2019). …

Executive Summary Blog

Claim Against Law Firm Alleging Failure to Transfer Client Files Satisfies Policy’s Definition of “Legal Services”

By Ashley-Anne L. Criss

September 6, 2019

The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, applying Massachusetts law, has held that a claim asserted against a law firm alleging the failure to transfer client files to former attorneys of the firm constituted a failure to render “Legal Services” as defined by a professional liability policy. Governo v. Allied World Ins. Co., 2019 WL 4034810 (D. Mass. Aug. 27, 2019). The court previously denied a motion to dismiss the case,…

Executive Summary Blog

Letter to Insured Asserting Right to Patent Applications Constitutes a Claim Made Prior to D&O Policy Period

By Ashley-Anne L. Criss

August 8, 2019

In a win for Wiley Rein’s client, a California state court has held that an insurer correctly denied coverage under a D&O policy on the basis that the operative “claim” was made before the policy period. CNEX Labs, Inc. v. Allied World Assurance Co. (U.S.), Inc., Case No. 18-CV-334461 (Cal. Super. Ct., Santa Clara Cty. Jul. 17, 2019). The court found that a letter the insured received before the policy period “clearly suggested a…

Executive Summary Blog

Insurer Lacked Conclusive Evidence of Insured’s Involvement to Trigger I v. I Exclusion; Insured’s Compromise of Favorable Judgment to Settle Multiple Suits Not a “Loss”

By Ashley-Anne L. Criss

July 2, 2019

The United States District Court for the Central District of California, applying California law, has held that an insurer lacked adequate information to deny coverage under an insured vs. insured exclusion in a D&O policy. MJC Supply, LLC v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., 2019 WL 2372279 (C.D. Cal. June 4, 2019). The court also held that the insureds’ notice under one policy constituted sufficient notice of the claim under two policies issued to a different…

Executive Summary Blog

Illinois Court Holds Insured is Entitled to Independent Counsel to Defend Uncovered Punitive Damages Claim

By Ashley-Anne L. Criss

May 24, 2019

An Illinois appeals court has held that an insured had the right to select independent counsel under a duty to defend policy where the insured faced a substantial, uncovered punitive damages award. See Xtreme Prot. Servs., LLC v. Steadfast Ins. Co., 2019 WL 1976482 (Ill. App. Ct. May 3, 2019).…

Executive Summary Blog

ERISA Exclusion Bars Coverage for Claims Arising From Denial of Employee’s Insurance Benefits

By Ashley-Anne L. Criss

April 25, 2019

The United States District Court for the Southern District of California has held that a liability insurer had no duty to defend a claim made against an insured arising out of the denial of an employee’s life insurance benefits because coverage was barred by an ERISA exclusion. By Referral Only, Inc. v. Travelers Prop. Cas. Co. of Am., 2019 WL 1559145 (S.D. Cal. Apr. 10, 2019).…

Executive Summary Blog

Connecticut Supreme Court Answers Certified Question in Favor of Insurance Adjuster, Holding That Continuing Course of Conduct Doctrine Did Not Toll Statute of Repose

By Ashley-Anne L. Criss

April 17, 2019

In a win for Wiley Rein’s client, the Connecticut Supreme Court has held that the continuing course of conduct doctrine could not save the untimely claims of an insurer brought against an insurance adjuster. See Essex Ins. Co. v. William Kramer & Associates, LLC, Case No. SC 20130 (Conn. Apr. 16, 2019). On a certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, the Supreme Court held that the doctrine…

Executive Summary Blog

Fourth Circuit Holds Virginia Statute Imposing Deadline to Deny Coverage Does Not Apply to Claim Reported Outside Policy Period

By Ashley-Anne L. Criss

March 12, 2019

Applying Virginia law, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has held that a Virginia statute imposing a forty-five day deadline for a coverage denial based on an insured’s breach of a liability policy does not apply to a denial based on a claim reported outside the policy period under a claims made and reported policy. See Gateway Residences at Exchange, LLC v. Illinois Union Ins. Co., 2019 WL 963238 (4th Cir. …

Executive Summary Blog

Court Holds Under Colorado Law Insurer is Entitled to Reimbursement of Settlement Payment From Insured

By Ashley-Anne L. Criss

February 28, 2019

Applying Colorado law, the United States District Court for the District of Colorado has held that a medical professional liability insurer was entitled to reimbursement of a settlement payment made on behalf of an insured to settle a dispute with a former patient. Evanston Ins. Co. v. Aminokit Labs., Inc., 2019 WL 479204 (D. Colo. Feb. 7, 2019).…

Ashley-Anne L. Criss

CEO’s Abuse of Position is Not “Professional Services” and Negligence Claim for Return of Monies Does Not Seek “Damages”

Third Circuit Finds Major Shareholder Exclusion Ambiguous as Applied to Company Acquiring All of Insured’s Stock after Policy Period

Claim Against Law Firm Alleging Failure to Transfer Client Files Satisfies Policy’s Definition of “Legal Services”

Letter to Insured Asserting Right to Patent Applications Constitutes a Claim Made Prior to D&O Policy Period

Insurer Lacked Conclusive Evidence of Insured’s Involvement to Trigger I v. I Exclusion; Insured’s Compromise of Favorable Judgment to Settle Multiple Suits Not a “Loss”

Illinois Court Holds Insured is Entitled to Independent Counsel to Defend Uncovered Punitive Damages Claim

ERISA Exclusion Bars Coverage for Claims Arising From Denial of Employee’s Insurance Benefits

Connecticut Supreme Court Answers Certified Question in Favor of Insurance Adjuster, Holding That Continuing Course of Conduct Doctrine Did Not Toll Statute of Repose

Fourth Circuit Holds Virginia Statute Imposing Deadline to Deny Coverage Does Not Apply to Claim Reported Outside Policy Period

Court Holds Under Colorado Law Insurer is Entitled to Reimbursement of Settlement Payment From Insured

Stay Connected

Company

Support

New to the Network