CAFA’s Local Controversy Exception Does Not Affect the District Court’s Ability to Exercise Federal Question Jurisdiction
Contents of Business Records Are Admissible As Evidence To Establish CAFA Jurisdiction
A post-complaint settlement demand constitutes an “other paper” for purposes of CAFA removal.
Section 1332(C)(1) Gives Dual, Not Alternative, Citizenship To A Corporation Whose Principal Place Of Business Is In A State Different From Where It Is Incorporated
Documents Pertaining To A Separate Case Does Not Constitute As ‘Other Paper’ To Ascertain Federal Jurisdiction Under CAFA
Costs Incurred on Injunction and Declaratory Relief Are Part of the Amount-in-controversy Under CAFA.
Estimation Of Potential Damages From The Complaint’s Allegations Is Acceptable For Establishing CAFA’s Amount In Controversy
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org