Fifth Circuit Reverses: Insured v. Insured Exclusion Does Not Apply To Indemnity Claim
Summary Judgment Premature Where Insurer Reserved Rights Under Capacity and Equity Interests Exclusions
Fourth Circuit Affirms Recoupment for Insurer Where Guilty Pleas Triggered Policy Exclusions
Unpaid Compensation and Breach of Contract Exclusions Bar Coverage for Independent Contractor’s Suit
Coverage Barred under “Known Risk” Exclusion Where Applicant for Insurance “On Notice” of Potential Malpractice Claim
Insurer Owes No Duty to Defend “Related Claim” Where Suit is Based on Same Course of Discriminatory Conduct Alleged in Prior Litigation
Colorado’s Notice-Prejudice Rule Does Not Apply to Claims-Made Policies
Neither “Insured v. Insured” Exclusion nor “Investment Loss Carve-Out” Bars Coverage for Receiver’s Action Against Bank’s Former Directors and Officers
No Rescission of Renewal Policy Where Original Application Not Incorporated into Application for Renewed Policy
Connect: Email
Blogs
Firm/Org