


Despite Allegation that Law Firm Was Not Providing “Legal Advice,” Complaint Triggers Duty to Defend Under Lawyers’ Professional Liability Policy

Benefits the Insured Promised But Failed to Provide Constitute Non-Covered Restitution

Alleged Errors In Employee Benefits Administration Potentially Trigger Fiduciary Liability Policy

Undue Influence Suit Alleges “Negligent Act, Error or Omission” Under E&O Policy

Vague Allegations Did Not Trigger Prior Knowledge Condition at Duty-to-Defend Stage
No Coverage for Criminal Investigation Where Claim Was Not Reported During Applicable Notice Period
False Claims Act Investigation Does not Implicate “Professional Services”
Attorneys’ Fees Awarded Pursuant to Statute Are Not “Damages”
Four-Month Delay in Sending Reservation of Rights Letter Creates Issue of Fact
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org