Skip to main content

Case

Robins v. Spokeo

17 published works

  1. Global Policy Watch

    Washington Anti-Spam Law Decision Addresses Article III Standing in CEMA Cases

    By Jehan Patterson, Irene Kim

    A federal court recently addressed whether plaintiffs alleging misleading commercial email practices in violation of Washington’s Commercial Electronic Mail Act (“CEMA”) have Article III standing to pursue claims. The ruling…

  2. Inside Consumer Protection

    Washington Anti-Spam Law Decision Addresses Article III Standing in CEMA Cases

    By Jehan Patterson, Irene Kim

    A federal court recently addressed whether plaintiffs alleging misleading commercial email practices in violation of Washington’s Commercial Electronic Mail Act (“CEMA”) have Article III standing to pursue claims. The ruling…

  3. Inside Class Actions

    Washington Anti-Spam Law Decision Addresses Article III Standing in CEMA Cases

    By Jehan Patterson, Irene Kim

    A federal court recently addressed whether plaintiffs alleging misleading commercial email practices in violation of Washington’s Commercial Electronic Mail Act (“CEMA”) have Article III standing to pursue claims. The ruling…

  4. Inside Privacy

    Washington Anti-Spam Law Decision Addresses Article III Standing in CEMA Cases

    By Jehan Patterson, Irene Kim

    A federal court recently addressed whether plaintiffs alleging misleading commercial email practices in violation of Washington’s Commercial Electronic Mail Act (“CEMA”) have Article III standing to pursue claims. The ruling…

  5. Minding Your Business

    Concrete Enough to Stand: Ninth Circuit Upholds FCRA Claims in Spokeo

    By Tiffany Woo

    On August 15, 2017, the Ninth Circuit delivered the latest episode in the Robins v. Spokeo saga, reaffirming on remand from the Supreme Court that plaintiff Robins had alleged an injury…

  6. Proskauer on Privacy

    Concrete Enough to Stand: Ninth Circuit Upholds FCRA Claims in Spokeo

    By Tiffany Woo

    On August 15, 2017, the Ninth Circuit delivered the latest episode in the Robins v. Spokeo saga, reaffirming on remand from the Supreme Court that plaintiff Robins had alleged an…

  7. Technology Law Dispatch

    Ninth Circuit Holds Alleged FCRA Violation Satisfies Article III Standing

    By Michael O'Neil, Michael Galibois

    The Ninth Circuit added another chapter to the storied tale of Article III standing jurisprudence on August 15 when, on remand from the Supreme Court, the appellate court unanimously revived…

  8. The D&O Diary

    Ninth Circuit’s Standing Ruling in Remanded Spokeo Case Could Boost Plaintiffs

    By Kevin LaCroix

    As courts have wrestled with standing issues in a variety of kinds of cases, the central question has been whether or not under the standard the U.S. Supreme Court enunciated…

  9. Constitutional Law Prof Blog

    On Remand, Ninth Circuit Says Spokeo Plaintiff Has Standing

    By Steven D. Schwinn

    Steven D. Schwinn, John Marshall Law SchoolThe Ninth Circuit ruled today that Thomas Robins suffered a sufficiently concrete injury to establish Article III standing in his case against the consumer…

  10. Class Action Lawsuit Defense

    Concrete and Particularized Part III: Initial Circuit Court Reactions to Spokeo

    By Elliot Morrison

    In the two months since the U.S. Supreme Court issued its much-awaited decision in Robins v. Spokeo, 136 S. Ct. 1540 (2016), a handful of federal circuits have applied the…