Leslie Katz recently published Hound Downed: Three Different Areas of the Law that Figure in The Hound of the Baskervilles, 2026. Provided below is the Abstract
A number of different areas of the law figure in The Hound of
How Do Wisconsin Courts Decide Relocation Requests?
What courts consider when evaluating relocation motions and disputes between parents.
Congratulations! Your company just offered you the opportunity to start a higher-paying position in a new city. After some research, you discover that moving to this city would not
Free & Useful Advice if You Think It’s “Game Over.”
November is what I like to call the “pre-season” for divorce. Many folks are scheduling lawyer consults. Not for now but with a plan to file after the holidays. One of the things they don’t consider enough is how they
My Kid Won’t Insist on a PreNup: Now What?
So, your life story is pretty simple. Graduated engineering school and got recruited by General Electric in 1980. Married in 1982. By the 1990s you were creating new stuff for GE when Jack Welch was taking it into finance. You
Don’t Expect “Honesty” When Your Kid Testifies in a Custody Case.
The case reported today is Herman v. Clark, a relocation case out of Delaware County. The child is 11 years old and has lived in a shared physical custody arrangement since 2017. In 2025 mother secured a job promotion premised
BC court orders new trial in family case where judge accepted new tort
Chambers judge ordered man to pay ex-wife $2,500 for placing her in a false light
Recognition of a Kosovar Judgment in Greece
Recognition of a Kosovar Judgment in Greece (copy)
When the Decree Falls Silent: A Rule 43 Order Does Not Survive Divorce – S.C.K v B.K (A143/2026) [2026] ZAWCHC 629 (23 October 2026).
This Full Bench appeal in the Western Cape Division decides whether an interim maintenance order granted under Rule 43 continues to operate after a decree of divorce that says nothing about the children’s maintenance. The court held that it does
No Notice, No Attachment: Freezing a Bank Account to Enforce Rule 43 Maintenance in M.T.J v E.C.J (2026-060216) [2026] ZAGPJHC 1216 (23 October 2026).
This case concerns the attachment of a husband’s bank account to enforce an unpaid Rule 43 maintenance order. The Johannesburg High Court set the attachment aside because the sheriff had not given the husband the written notice required by Rule