Ruling In Contempt Proceedings Did Not Inhibit Family Code Section 271 Sanctions.
On October 2, 2026, we posted on Arora v. Arora, Case No. D086321 (4th Dist., Div. 1 September 28, 2026), which was unpublished at the time. We can
Ruling In Contempt Proceedings Did Not Inhibit Family Code Section 271 Sanctions.
On October 2, 2026, we posted on Arora v. Arora, Case No. D086321 (4th Dist., Div. 1 September 28, 2026), which was unpublished at the time. We can…
It’s hard enough for a child to lose a parent, but to have to wonder where they’ll live next adds uncertainty at a time when they most need stability. When a relative has been taking care of the child and…
This case concerns a former husband who, for the better part of seven years, paid his ex-wife’s court-ordered rehabilitative maintenance when and in the amount he chose, pleaded poverty and illness when called to account, and relied on a variation…
This case concerns a wife, married out of community of property without accrual, who sought interim preservation orders over assets held by a family trust and a company controlled by her husband, pending her section 7(3) redistribution counterclaim in a…
Answer: $7,500 Payable To The Other Side, According To The 4/1 DCA.
We do monitor appeal sanctions. Marriage of Ghazi and Richard, Case No. D086782 (4th Dist., Div. 1 Oct. 21, 2026) (unpublished) involved an ex-husband’s unsuccessful appeal of…
Hacienda puede tratar de forma diferente a las dos partes
Una resolución del TEAC muestra que algunos pagos efectuados tras una separación pueden tributar para quien los recibe, aunque no den derecho a reducción fiscal a quien los realiza.
Tras…
Sharing a home does not automatically make two people a de facto couple. Equally, living apart does not necessarily mean that a de facto relationship cannot exist. Under Australian family law, the question involves more than an address.
The central…