Special Fee Shifting Statutes: 2/6 DCA’s Reversal Of A Decision Finding No Brown Act Violations Meant That A Remand Was Necessary To Determine If Fees Were Warranted (JSON)

lexblog.com/lib/30367TFEview recordjson

{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "headline": "Special Fee Shifting Statutes: 2/6 DCA’s Reversal Of A Decision Finding No Brown Act Violations Meant That A Remand Was Necessary To Determine If Fees Were Warranted",
    "url": "https://www.lexblog.com/2025/08/09/special-fee-shifting-statutes-2-6-dcas-reversal-of-a-decision-finding-no-brown-act-violations-meant-that-a-remand-was-necessary-to-determine-if-fees-were-warranted/",
    "identifier": {
        "@type": "PropertyValue",
        "name": "LexBlog Library record",
        "value": "LEX-WK-30367TFE",
        "url": "https://www.lexblog.com/lib/30367TFE/"
    },
    "datePublished": "2025-08-09T00:00:00-04:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-09T00:00:00-04:00",
    "author": {
        "@type": "Person",
        "name": "Marc Alexander"
    },
    "sourceOrganization": {
        "@type": "Organization",
        "name": "Marc Alexander"
    },
    "organizationScope": "at-publication",
    "isPartOf": "CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY'S FEES",
    "about": "Business of Law",
    "sourceUrl": "https://www.calattorneysfees.com/2025/08/special-fee-shifting-statutes-26-dcas-reversal-of-a-decision-finding-no-brown-act-violations-meant-t.html",
    "sourceStability": "may-move"
}