Virtually Identical Trade Secret Theft Cases Result in Opposite Conclusions: Lessons from the Second Circuit’s Attention to Detail (JSON)

lexblog.com/lib/693566TYview recordjson

{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "headline": "Virtually Identical Trade Secret Theft Cases Result in Opposite Conclusions:  Lessons from the Second Circuit’s Attention to Detail",
    "url": "https://www.lexblog.com/2013/08/07/virtually-identical-trade-secret-theft-cases-result-in-opposite-conclusions-lessons-from-the-second-circuits-attention-to-detail/",
    "identifier": {
        "@type": "PropertyValue",
        "name": "LexBlog Library record",
        "value": "LEX-WK-693566TY",
        "url": "https://www.lexblog.com/lib/693566TY/"
    },
    "datePublished": "2013-08-07T00:00:00-04:00",
    "dateModified": "2018-07-26T00:04:01-04:00",
    "author": {
        "@type": "Person",
        "name": "Jennifer Achilles"
    },
    "sourceOrganization": {
        "@type": "Organization",
        "name": "Reed Smith LLP"
    },
    "organizationScope": "at-publication",
    "isPartOf": "Global Regulatory Enforcement Law Blog",
    "about": "Business and Commercial",
    "sourceUrl": "http://globalreg.local.lexblog.com/2013/08/07/virtually-identical-trade-secret-theft-cases-result-in-opposite-conclusions-lessons-from-the-second-circuits-attention-to-detail/",
    "sourceStability": "may-move"
}