Skip to main content
lexblog.com/lib/7P3EM491viewrecordjson
LEX-WK-7P3EM491crawled 2023-05-25 16:17Z

Ninth Circuit Holds That a Project’s NEPA Analysis Need Not Explain Why Its Impact Significance Conclusions Differ from CEQA Analysis of the Same Project; Dissent Perceives Environmental Racism at Work

Samuel D. Bacal-Graves · Published January 4, 2022

Work details

firm or organization
Downey Brand LLP
published
2022-01-04

Citation

Samuel D. Bacal-Graves, Ninth Circuit Holds That a Project’s NEPA Analysis Need Not Explain Why Its Impact Significance Conclusions Differ from CEQA Analysis of the Same Project; Dissent Perceives Environmental Racism at Work (January 4, 2022) [The Library at LexBlog, LEX-WK-7P3EM491, lexpid.org/7P3EM491]