Delaware Chancery Court Dismisses Plaintiffs’ Counsel In Merger Class Action, Challenging Credibility Of All Counsel In Connection With Proposed Settlement (JSON)

lexblog.com/lib/88D032AJview recordjson

{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "headline": "Delaware Chancery Court Dismisses Plaintiffs’ Counsel In Merger Class Action, Challenging Credibility Of All Counsel In Connection With Proposed Settlement",
    "url": "https://www.lexblog.com/2010/04/21/delaware-chancery-court-dismisses-plaintiffs-counsel-in-merger-class-action-challenging-credibility-of-all-counsel-in-connection-with-proposed-settlement/",
    "identifier": {
        "@type": "PropertyValue",
        "name": "LexBlog Library record",
        "value": "LEX-WK-88D032AJ",
        "url": "https://www.lexblog.com/lib/88D032AJ/"
    },
    "datePublished": "2010-04-21T04:38:27-04:00",
    "dateModified": "2010-04-21T04:38:27-04:00",
    "author": {
        "@type": "Person",
        "name": "Jonathan Moss, John Stigi"
    },
    "sourceOrganization": {
        "@type": "Organization",
        "name": "Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP"
    },
    "organizationScope": "at-publication",
    "about": "Corporate Governance and Compliance · Ethics & Professional Responsibility",
    "sourceUrl": "http://classactiondefensestrategy.wp.lexblogs.com/2010/04/delaware-chancery-court-dismisses-plaintiffs-counsel-in-merger-class-action-challenging-credibility-of-all-counsel-in-connection-with-proposed-settlement/",
    "sourceStability": "may-move"
}