The Paris Court of Appeals states that granting a stay of execution involves analyzing only the “manifestly excessive consequences” of a sanction imposed, and not its merits in Bisphenol A case (JSON)

lexblog.com/lib/ATNZKB5Vview recordjson

{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "headline": "The Paris Court of Appeals states that granting a stay of execution involves analyzing only the “manifestly excessive consequences” of a sanction imposed, and not its merits in Bisphenol A case",
    "url": "https://www.lexblog.com/2024/07/24/the-paris-court-of-appeals-states-that-granting-a-stay-of-execution-involves-analyzing-only-the-manifestly-excessive-consequences-of-a-sanction-imposed-and-not-its-merits-in-bisphen/",
    "identifier": {
        "@type": "PropertyValue",
        "name": "LexBlog Library record",
        "value": "LEX-WK-ATNZKB5V",
        "url": "https://www.lexblog.com/lib/ATNZKB5V/"
    },
    "datePublished": "2024-07-24T17:10:00-04:00",
    "dateModified": "2024-11-14T14:21:52-05:00",
    "author": {
        "@type": "Person",
        "name": "François-Charles Laprévote, Hugo Gilli, Paulina Espinoza"
    },
    "sourceOrganization": {
        "@type": "Organization",
        "name": "Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP"
    },
    "organizationScope": "at-publication",
    "isPartOf": "Cleary Antitrust Watch",
    "about": "Antitrust, Competition and Trade",
    "sourceUrl": "https://www.clearyantitrustwatch.com/?p=6309",
    "sourceStability": "may-move"
}