An Insurer is not Vicariously Liable for Actions by an Agent That Are Outside the Scope of the Agency Relationship and Were Performed in the Agent’s Dual Role as a Broker (JSON)

lexblog.com/lib/F76FGQMMview recordjson

{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "headline": "An Insurer is not Vicariously Liable for Actions by an Agent That Are Outside the Scope of the Agency Relationship and Were Performed in the Agent’s Dual Role as a Broker",
    "url": "https://www.lexblog.com/2024/12/18/an-insurer-is-not-vicariously-liable-for-actions-by-an-agent-that-are-outside-the-scope-of-the-agency-relationship-and-were-performed-in-the-agents-dual-role-as-a-broker/",
    "identifier": {
        "@type": "PropertyValue",
        "name": "LexBlog Library record",
        "value": "LEX-WK-F76FGQMM",
        "url": "https://www.lexblog.com/lib/F76FGQMM/"
    },
    "datePublished": "2024-12-18T14:43:20-05:00",
    "dateModified": "2024-12-18T15:06:17-05:00",
    "author": {
        "@type": "Person",
        "name": "Katherine Sample"
    },
    "sourceOrganization": {
        "@type": "Organization",
        "name": "Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP"
    },
    "organizationScope": "at-publication",
    "isPartOf": "Insurance Law Blog",
    "about": "Insurance",
    "sourceUrl": "https://www.insurancelawblog.com/?p=2007",
    "sourceStability": "may-move"
}