Third Circuit Restores Rule B Attachment Based On Breach of Contract Claim Under English Law, Implied Indemnity Claim Not Enough (JSON)

lexblog.com/lib/K1849DDAview recordjson

{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "headline": "Third Circuit Restores Rule B Attachment Based On Breach of Contract Claim Under English Law, Implied Indemnity Claim Not Enough",
    "url": "https://www.lexblog.com/2024/01/24/third-circuit-restores-rule-b-attachment-based-on-breach-of-contract-claim-under-english-law-implied-indemnity-claim-not-enough-2/",
    "identifier": {
        "@type": "PropertyValue",
        "name": "LexBlog Library record",
        "value": "LEX-WK-K1849DDA",
        "url": "https://www.lexblog.com/lib/K1849DDA/"
    },
    "datePublished": "2024-01-24T11:44:07-05:00",
    "dateModified": "2024-02-26T15:32:09-05:00",
    "author": {
        "@type": "Person",
        "name": "Jonas S. Patzwall"
    },
    "sourceOrganization": {
        "@type": "Organization",
        "name": "Liskow & Lewis"
    },
    "organizationScope": "at-publication",
    "isPartOf": "The Maritime Law Blog",
    "about": "Admiralty and Maritime",
    "sourceUrl": "https://liskowmaritimeblogpremier.lexblogplatformthree.com/?p=2400",
    "sourceStability": "may-move"
}