Skip to main content
lexblog.com/lib/Q8TYP1APviewrecordjson
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "headline": "Fifth Circuit Stay Means Preventive Services Mandate Remains in Effect",
    "url": "https://www.jimersonfirm.com/blog/2026/11/i-75-at-nw-49th-street-in-ocala-what-nearby-business-owners-should-know/",
    "identifier": {
        "@type": "PropertyValue",
        "name": "LexBlog Library record",
        "value": "LEX-WK-Q8TYP1AP",
        "url": "https://www.lexblog.com/lib/Q8TYP1AP/"
    },
    "datePublished": "2023-06-15T10:47:03-04:00",
    "dateModified": "2023-08-29T15:58:56-04:00",
    "author": {
        "@type": "Person",
        "name": "Jennifer Rigterink, Robert Projansky, Tanusha Yarlagadda"
    },
    "sourceOrganization": {
        "@type": "Organization",
        "name": "Proskauer Rose LLP"
    },
    "organizationScope": "at-publication",
    "isPartOf": "Compensation & Benefits Blog",
    "about": "Health Care and Life Sciences",
    "sourceUrl": "https://www.erisapracticecenter.com/?p=4040",
    "sourceStability": "may-move"
}