{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "Article",
"headline": "Special Fee Shifting Statutes: Because Plaintiff Prevailed Through Mandate Challenging A Conditional Permit Revocation, It Correctly Was Denied Fees Under A Local Public Nuisance Ordinance With Reciprocal Fee-Shifting Provisions",
"url": "https://www.lexblog.com/2025/08/19/special-fee-shifting-statutes-because-plaintiff-prevailed-through-mandate-challenging-a-conditional-permit-revocation-it-correctly-was-denied-fees-under-a-local-public-nuisance-ordinance-with-recipr/",
"identifier": {
"@type": "PropertyValue",
"name": "LexBlog Library record",
"value": "LEX-WK-QH8VG5AR",
"url": "https://www.lexblog.com/lib/QH8VG5AR/"
},
"datePublished": "2025-08-19T00:00:00-04:00",
"dateModified": "2025-08-19T00:00:00-04:00",
"author": {
"@type": "Person",
"name": "Marc Alexander"
},
"sourceOrganization": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "Marc Alexander"
},
"organizationScope": "at-publication",
"isPartOf": "CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY'S FEES",
"about": "Business of Law",
"sourceUrl": "https://www.calattorneysfees.com/2025/08/special-fee-shifting-statutes-because-plaintiff-prevailed-through-mandate-challenging-a-conditional-.html",
"sourceStability": "may-move"
}