LEX-WK-Z9S5GCGKcrawled 2023-11-27 13:02Z
Clariant v. Commission (Case T-590/20): The General Court endorses a systematic increase of the basic amount of the fine for purchasing cartels and assimilates these types of cartels to sales cartels for the purpose of analyzing recidivism, but does not punish Clariant for appealing a settlement decision
Julia Blanco · Aleksandar Jevtic · Antti Kunnari · Cleary Antitrust Watch · Published October 18, 2023
Work details
- author
- Julia Blanco · Aleksandar Jevtic · Antti Kunnari
- firm or organization
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
- publication
- Cleary Antitrust Watch
- practice area
- Antitrust, Competition and Trade
- published
- 2023-10-18
Citation
Julia Blanco, Aleksandar Jevtic, Antti Kunnari, Clariant v. Commission (Case T-590/20): The General Court endorses a systematic increase of the basic amount of the fine for purchasing cartels and assimilates these types of cartels to sales cartels for the purpose of analyzing recidivism, but does not punish Clariant for appealing a settlement decision, Cleary Antitrust Watch (October 18, 2023) [The Library at LexBlog, LEX-WK-Z9S5GCGK, lexpid.org/Z9S5GCGK]