Skip to main content

Published works by J. Thomas Richie

LEX-AR-DTP0A8GZ · complete body of work · page 1 of 2 · 41 works

Published works

Circuit Split on Incentive Payments to Class Representatives Deepens
Declassified · October 7, 2022
LEX-WK-CZT5BGD3
What to Expect When You’re Expecting a Biometric Class Action: Settlements
Declassified · April 25, 2022
LEX-WK-42W5BK4E
Setting Boundaries for the Field of Discretion: Fifth Circuit Clarifies that Daubert Standard Applies to Expert Opinions at Class Certification
Declassified · March 3, 2021
LEX-WK-684HN1W9
Eleventh Circuit Rejects Administrative Feasibility as a Requirement for Class Actions
Declassified · February 22, 2021
LEX-WK-4WBYR4FR
No Worse for Butter: Ninth Circuit Says Popcorn’s “Secret” Ingredient Does Not Confer Article III Standing
Declassified · December 21, 2020
LEX-WK-8TBHG1K0
Competing Duties and Courts: 11th Circuit Clarifies Procedures and Counsel Duties in Competing Class Actions
Declassified · December 16, 2020
LEX-WK-DSS5BQPD
The En Banc 11th Circuit Clarifies “Risk of Identity Theft” Standing
Declassified · November 5, 2020
LEX-WK-E0EKW28Z
11th Circuit Forbids Incentive Payments
Declassified · September 22, 2020
LEX-WK-YFEEQCXJ
D.C. Circuit Avoids Decisive Ruling on Personal Jurisdiction in Class Actions
Declassified · March 18, 2020
LEX-WK-Z08CYD15
“I told you never to call me here”: Eleventh Circuit Decertifies TCPA Class Containing Absent Class Members Without Article III Standing
Declassified · December 6, 2019
LEX-WK-4C5XB9MY
It’s None of Your Business: Sixth Circuit Says Arizona Lacks Article III Standing to Intervene to Challenge a Class Settlement
Declassified · October 21, 2019
LEX-WK-RADBFNTB
“Who’s Gonna Pay for All This?” Can Prevailing Litigants Have Their E-discovery Charges Taxed as Costs Against Their Losing Opponents?
Declassified · September 12, 2019
LEX-WK-V1V3PTFZ
One Spam Text Does Not Confer Standing in the Eleventh Circuit
Declassified · September 9, 2019
LEX-WK-EB0024WP
A Quick Study in Doxing and Personal Jurisdiction: <i>Vangheluwe v. GotNews</i>
Declassified · September 5, 2019
LEX-WK-5161KNBG
Ask and You Shall Be Deemed to Have Consented to Receive: The Eleventh Circuit Affirms TCPA Fax Summary Judgment
Declassified · August 29, 2019
LEX-WK-E9SHWY5Y
Yes, But Were You Hurt? Another Data Breach Case Dismissed for Lack of Damages
Declassified · August 27, 2019
LEX-WK-PKAZ9A9N
The Eleventh Circuit Finds Class Rep Has Standing to Settle a FACTA Class Action
Declassified · April 29, 2019
LEX-WK-0V5SAZ7V
Lamps Plus v. Varela: It’s Lights Out for Class Arbitration under Ambiguous Arb Agreements
Declassified · April 26, 2019
LEX-WK-HBPSKVJS
Another Punt: The Supreme Court Denies Certiorari in the <i>Zappos</i> Case
Declassified · March 27, 2019
LEX-WK-ZE4AZFPS
<i>Frank v. Gaos</i>: Remand, but Little Guidance.
Declassified · March 20, 2019
LEX-WK-KSEEDVHB
Third Circuit Reinforces That FACTA Class Actions Remain Ideal Targets for <i>Spokeo</i> Challenges
Declassified · March 18, 2019
LEX-WK-WX5YND7Q
Injury-in-Fact vs. Actual Damages — Avoiding a Jurisdictional Sideshow in Data Breach Class Actions by Challenging Damages, Not Injury
Declassified · March 7, 2019
LEX-WK-H62AV9PS
Practical Effects of the Rule 23 Amendments – Really, Not Very Much
Declassified · March 4, 2019
LEX-WK-SAFQ5X95
Illinois Supreme Court Adopts Expansive Interpretation of Standing under Illinois BIPA, Potentially Opening the Flood Gates for Class Actions
Declassified · February 6, 2019
LEX-WK-ENVBY7NR
<i>Bristol-Myers Squibb</i> Continues to Be a Mixed Bag in the Class Action Context
Declassified · December 20, 2018
LEX-WK-4CQZXRXH