INTRODUCTION
The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India examined crucial legal questions regarding compliance with Section 146 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (MVA), the classification of motor vehicle insurance policies and the extent of coverage provided to vehicle occupants under
INTRODUCTION
The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India recently tackled a critical procedural question regarding the scope and limits of recalling a witness and reopening evidence at the fag end of a civil trial. In K. Bharathamma v. Bandaru Sakku Bai
The dispute in this case required the Court to interpret Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, read with Note 6 to Section XVI of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. While the Revenue contended that Xerox India manufactured
The Supreme Court of India has once again reaffirmed an important procedural principle governing civil trials: Order XVIII Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), is not a mechanism for parties to improve their case after evidence
Recently, in K. Subba Rao v. The State of Telangana MANU/SC/0880/2018 : (2018) 14 SCC 452, it was also observed that:6. The Courts should be careful in proceeding against the distant relatives in crimes pertaining to matrimonial disputes and
Insofar as Appellant Nos. 2 to 6 are concerned, we find that they have no connection to the matter at hand and have been dragged into the web of crime without any rhyme or reason. A perusal of the FIR
When a workplace grievance feels serious enough to be a “human rights” issue, employees increasingly turn to State Human Rights Commissions (SHRCs). But can an SHRC actually take on a private employer? On 13 July 2026, the Telangana High Court
The Supreme Court has recalled its April 2025 order directing petitioners challenging various Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments laws in Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and Puducherry to approach the respective High Courts.
The Bench of Justice BV Nagarathna and
The Telangana High Court has refused to grant interim protection from arrest to Bandi Sai Bageerath in a case registered under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.
The single-judge Bench of Justice T Madhavi Devi passed the
