Exterro
Exterro is a software company specializing in data risk management and e-discovery solutions. It provides a platform that integrates various e-discovery activities such as legal hold management, data preservation, collection, processing, and review. Exterro's offerings include tools for early case assessment, remote mobile discovery, digital forensics, and compliance with data privacy regulations like the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). The company publishes content focused on legal and regulatory developments, best practices in e-discovery, data privacy compliance, and case law analysis relevant to litigation and data management professionals. Its materials aim to support legal teams, compliance officers, and forensic investigators in managing electronic data efficiently and defensibly.
Exterro Blogs
Blog Authors
Latest from Exterro
Be Prepared! Don’t Show Up to Your Rule 26(F) Meet-and-Confer With Nothing But a Boilerplate
Case Law Alert: If You Fail, Try Again
DriveTime Car Sales Company, LLC v. Pettigrew (S.D. Ohio April 18, 2019) re-emphasizes the high and “stringent” standard for granting an adverse inference instruction under FRCP 37(e)(2).
Overview:
In this defamation case between two airlines, the plaintiffs objected to the magistrate…
CCPA…The Most Significant Impact on Litigation Since FRCP
Friday Funnies: Exterro’s E-Discovery Meme Series (Budget Approved! Edition)
For an e-discovery team, there’s not many things more worth a big celebration than getting budget for e-discovery software–so make sure you do it in style. If you don’t have budget yet, why not check out our E-Discovery Software Budget…
4 Trends Shaping E-Discovery Today
Friday Funnies: Exterro’s E-Discovery Meme Series (Water Polo Edition)
Case Law Alert: Deleted Text Messages = No Adverse Inference Because No Intent
DriveTime Car Sales Company, LLC v. Pettigrew (S.D. Ohio April 18, 2019) re-emphasizes the high and “stringent” standard for granting an adverse inference instruction under FRCP 37(e)(2).
Overview:
In this fraud case between an employee and employer, the plaintiff filed motion…




