In its non-precedential decision in the case of Liveshitz v. Designer Brands, Inc., No. 23-3082 (3d Cir. Jan. 13, 2025 Matey, J., Shwartz, J., and McKee, J.) (Op. by Matey, J.), the Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the
Foley, Comerford & Cummins
Founded in 1956, the Scranton, Pennsylvania law firm of Foley, Comerford & Cummins has maintained its excellent reputation for thorough and exceptional handling of the defense of civil litigation matters all across Northeastern Pennsylvania for more than 50 years. Our experienced attorneys provide a general range of litigation services and take pride in securing prompt results for our clients in a cost-effective and efficient manner. We are proud of our sustained record of success at trial as well as in negotiating favorable settlements with minimal litigation whenever possible.
Latest from Foley, Comerford & Cummins - Page 6
Venue of UIM Case Transferred Due To Terms of Forum Selection Clause in Policy
Federal Court Finds No Jurisdiction Over Insurance Company Existed Under Claims Asserted
In the case of Abira Medical Laboratories, LLC v. Freedom Life Insurance Co., No. 2:24-CV-02110-JHS (E.D. Pa. Jan. 10, 2025 Slomsky, J.), the Eastern District Federal Court of Pennsylvania, addressing a question of first impression, held that a Defendant…
Superior Court Confirms that Parties Entitled to 30 Days to Respond to Motion for Summary Judgment
Allegations of Recklessness Upheld in a Case Where Negligence Was Alleged
In the case of Janes v. Charles, No. 2024-CV-409 (C.P. Lacka. Co. Jan. 28, 2025 Nealon, J.), the court overruled Preliminary Objections filed by a Defendant in the nature of a demurrer seeking to strike the allegations of gross,…
Attorney's Sexual Misconduct Towards a Client Found to Constitute Viable Basis for Legal Malpractice Claim
In the case of J.C. v. Fanucci & Kolcharno, No. 2022-CV-3490 (C.P. Lacka. Co. Feb. 4, 2025 Nealon, J.), the court addressed various Preliminary Objections filed in a case where a client sued her former attorney and his law…