We were recently successful in obtaining a stay from a civil action involving our condominium client and a neighbouring condominium. The two condos were parties to a Reciprocal Agreement and Indemnity Agreement (the “Agreements”) and after a dispute arose
Gardiner Miller Arnold LLP
Gardiner Miller Arnold LLP is a Toronto-based law firm specializing in condominium law, real estate law, business law, litigation and dispute resolution, and wills and estates law. The firm focuses on providing cost-effective legal solutions with an emphasis on condominium boards, property managers, and owners, offering specialized advice tailored to condominium governance and compliance. Their publications often address practical legal issues related to condominium living, including owner alterations, dispute resolution, accommodation requests under human rights law, and financial matters such as chargebacks and audits. The firm also engages in educating stakeholders through detailed analyses of relevant cases and legislative provisions affecting condominium communities.
Latest from Gardiner Miller Arnold LLP - Page 4
Condo meeting minefields
We saw “condo meeting” cases before the court in 2021, seeking procedural directions or injunctions to stop them.
For each case that made it to a judge, more cases were negotiated between condo lawyers and owner lawyers, at a cost…
Condo neighbour disputes don’t belong in the courts
A recent court decision confirmed that disputes between neighbours should not be adjudicated by the courts as the first step (unless there is injury or danger to others or property). Parties should instead pursue mediation and arbitration. We have written…
$14M Special Assessments or: How I learned to stop worrying and take condo governance seriously
A Toronto condominium is making headlines after levying a $14 million special assessment. The condo’s 321 units were given 15 days to pay between $30,000 to $42,500. Many residents are seniors who see their units as their retirement home but…
Top 10 condo cases of 2021!
The latest issue of our newsletter, Condo Alert!, Winter 2021, features our Top 10 condo cases of 2021. This past year saw a trend in condo decisions reinforcing the importance of mandatory mediation, more discretionary costs and in oppression…
Mandatory condo mediation continued – Compliance legal costs not recoverable without exhausting mediation
The court recently disallowed compliance costs claimed by a condo corporation because it did not first mediate compliance issues under section 132(4) of the Condominium Act, 1998 (the “Act”).
Mr. Friend is a unit owner who had a long-standing…
CAT should award legal fees
The CAO is investigating if legal costs should be awarded in CAT cases. The effect of CAT’s Costs Rule No. 45 has generally resulted in no costs awards in records cases except in exceptional circumstances. Condos should take advantage of…
Time for grandfather to retire
A recent CAT decision about smoking rules contained the following in its introduction:
“ … this Tribunal has identified concerns with the use of the term “grandfathering” generally, as its origins are problematic, notwithstanding its long-standing social usage. The Tribunal…
Judicial review of CAT decision not available before exhausting Condo Act appeal
The Divisional Court of Ontario recently considered a condo corporation’s application for judicial review of a CAT decision. However, the court dismissed the application because the corporation did not exhaust its right of appeal under the Condo Act
Judicial review…
Oppression in condominiums: “Feeling of expectation” must be objectively reasonable
The opening paragraphs to Berman v. York Condominium Corp. No. 99 could not have set up the starting point for an oppression application any better:
The oppression remedy starts by someone having an expectation….But to be actionable at law, a…