On August 31, 2017 the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division’s decision in Charles Krik v. Exxon Mobil Corporation, et al. excluding the
Manning Gross + Massenburg LLP
Manning Gross + Massenburg LLP (MG+M) is a law firm that publishes blogs primarily focused on litigation and regulatory issues related to environmental law, toxic torts, and product liability. The firm provides insights on topics such as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) litigation, environmental contamination, class action lawsuits, and regulatory developments at state and federal levels. MG+M's content often addresses legal strategies, risk management, and scientific aspects of environmental and toxic tort cases. The firm also covers developments in employment litigation, business litigation, and other specialized practice areas relevant to corporate defendants and complex litigation matters.
Latest from Manning Gross + Massenburg LLP - Page 11
Johnson & Johnson Hit With $417 Million Verdict In Spite of Inconclusive Scientific Evidence
A new wave of lawsuits alleging an association between ovarian cancer and the use of talcum powder for feminine hygiene purposes – a claim that many believe is based on questionable science – has hit an all-time high. Last week,…
Application of Bristol-Myers in the Los Angeles Superior Court
As previously reported, the issue of establishing personal jurisdiction when there is no causal link between defendant’s forum contacts and plaintiff’s claims was recently decided by the United States Supreme Court in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California…
California’s Proposed Bill Seeks to Place Time Restraints on Depositions and Threatens Defendants’ Due Process Rights
Federal Court Sustains Summary Judgment Motion While Drawing Clear Distinction Between Pleural and Peritoneal Mesothelioma
Bulk Supplier, Sophisticated User, and Component Parts Doctrines May Provide Effective Defense to Talc Suppliers Whose Products are “Inherently Safe”
When Can An Attorney Instruct Their Witness Not To Answer During A Deposition, And What Should You Do In Response In Order To Obtain An Answer?
Fourth Circuit Joins Unanimous Federal Circuits – No Requirement That Government Prohibit Contractor From Warning About Asbestos For Government Contractor Defense To Apply
Massachusetts Superior Court Invalidates Forum Selection Clause and Dismisses Employer’s Action To Enforce a Noncompetition Agreement
Oxford Global Resources, LLC v. Hernandez
Superior Court of Massachusetts
(Suffolk, Business Litigation Session)
Docket No. 1684-CV-03911-BLS-2
The Business Litigation Session of the Suffolk Superior Court in Massachusetts invalidated a contractual forum selection clause and dismissed an employer’s action…