Class Action Issue
In a recent decision addressing privacy claims arising from the electronic tracking of a customer’s online behavioral activity, a federal district court’s analysis highlighted the significance of a comprehensive privacy notice in establishing a customer’s consent to…
Continue Reading THE SIGNIFICANCE OF A WEBSITE'S COMPREHENSIVE PRIVACY STATEMENT IN REDUCING CLASS ACTION EXPOSURE
Class Action Issue
In Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. Jackson, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed whether either the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”) or the general removal statute (28 U.S.C. §1441(a)) allows a party brought into a lawsuit…
Continue Reading NOT ALL DEFENDANTS ARE TREATED THE SAME UNDER CAFA FOR REMOVAL PURPOSES
Class Action Issue In Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. Jackson, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed whether either the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”) or the general removal statute (28 U.S.C. §1441(a)) allows a party brought into a lawsuit…
Continue Reading NOT ALL DEFENDANTS ARE TREATED THE SAME UNDER CAFA FOR REMOVAL PURPOSES
Class Action Issue In Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. Jackson, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed whether either the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”) or the general removal statute (28 U.S.C. §1441(a)) allows a party brought into a lawsuit…
Continue Reading NOT ALL DEFENDANTS ARE TREATED THE SAME UNDER CAFA FOR REMOVAL PURPOSES
Class Action Issue In Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. Jackson, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed whether either the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”) or t…
Continue Reading NOT ALL DEFENDANTS ARE TREATED THE SAME UNDER CAFA FOR REMOVAL PURPOSES
Class Action Issue In Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. Jackson, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed whether either the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”) or t…
Continue Reading NOT ALL DEFENDANTS ARE TREATED THE SAME UNDER CAFA FOR REMOVAL PURPOSES
