The version of the Reference Manual on the NASEM website still has the climate science chapter.
The FJC website has a version without the climate science chapter. There is a note that the chapter was removed on February 6, 2026.
Perhaps the
Nathan A. Schachtman
Nathan A. Schachtman is a publisher known for producing content that critically examines scientific evidence and its interpretation in legal contexts, particularly focusing on issues of causation, expert witness testimony, and regulatory science. The publications often analyze controversies involving pharmaceutical safety, environmental toxicants, and litigation strategies, with attention to biases in scientific research and the legal standards for admissibility of expert opinions. The content includes detailed discussions of epidemiology, toxicology, and the intersection of science and law, addressing topics such as acetaminophen risks, glyphosate litigation, and the role of scientific evidence in courts. The publisher also covers developments in legal standards and scientific responsibility in judicial settings.
Website:
https://schachtmanlaw.com
Latest from Nathan A. Schachtman - Page 3
The FJC Retracts Climate Science Chapter in New Reference Manual
When the new, fourth, edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence was released late last year,[1] I remarked that there were some new chapters,[2] including one on climate change. I found the addition of a chapter on…
Selikoff’s Role in Establishing OSHA
In May 1970, Selikoff testified in support of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, on which the Senate was then deliberating. By many accounts, Selikoff’s testimony helped overcome significant resistance to “federalizing” the workplace,[1] by establishing national…
The 4th Reference Manual’s Treatment of Genetic Causes of Disease
Signature Diseases in the New Reference Manual
Reference Manual 4th Edition Corrects Some, Not All, Mistakes on Confidence Intervals
A New Year, A New Reference Manual
The fourth edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence was quietly released in the waning hours of 2025, in the twilight of American democracy.[1] The Manual had been slated to be published in 2023, but that date slid…
IARC’s Industry Sniffing Bots Are Coming for You
“Hey, hey, you, you, get off of my cloud.” …. Jagger & Richards
For the last 50 years, critics, cranks, and anti-industry zealots have argued that industry-sponsored science is vitiated by conflicts of interest. What started as the whining of…
Prada – Fashionable, But Unreliable Review on Acetaminophen and Autism
Back in the first week of this month, I posted about a paper (Prada 2025),[1] which featured a so-called navigation-guide systematic review of the scientific evidence on the issue whether pregnant women’s ingestion of acetaminophen causes their children to…
Specific Causation – The Process of Elimination
Specific causation causes some courts to become costive, and sometimes, courts overuse so-called differential etiology as a laxative. The phrase “differential etiology” is an analogy to differential diagnosis, the reasoning process by which clinicians assess the identity of a disease…