In In Re Laura Charlene Goebel, No. 25-103 (2d Cir. 2026), the Second Circuit joins a circuit split over whether Article I bankruptcy courts are constrained by Article III case or controversy requirements.
The IRS appealed a decision of
Paul W. Mollica
Paul W. Mollica is a legal publisher or organization that provides detailed analysis and commentary on federal and tribal court decisions, focusing on procedural and substantive issues in civil and criminal law. The content includes case law interpretations related to federal rules of civil and criminal procedure, jurisdictional questions, tribal court authority, and intellectual property enforcement. The publisher covers appellate court rulings that clarify legal standards for service of process, jurisdictional limits, evidentiary sufficiency, and contractual obligations. The materials are aimed at legal professionals interested in federal appellate jurisprudence, tribal law, and procedural nuances in litigation.
Latest from Paul W. Mollica - Page 2
Second Circuit Panel Notes an Oddity in Appellate Review of Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(a) Orders That Creates a Trap for the Unwary
In Raymond v. 1199SEIU Nat’l Benefit Fund, No. 25-707 (2d Cir. July 23, 2026), the panel holds that it cannot review a Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(a) order denying a new trial on quirky ground that apparently no other…
Split Fifth Circuit Panel Grants Mandamus to End a Sixty-Year-Old School Desegregation Case Where Every Remaining Party Filed an Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1) Stipulation of Dismissal
In In re School Board of Concordia Parish, No. 26-30074 (5th Cir. July 14, 2026), the panel dismisses an appeal by the parties from the District Court’s refusal to terminate a long-running school desegregation case pursuant to a…
Split Fifth Circuit Panel Holds That A Vape Manufacture Had a Seventh Amendment Right to a Jury Trial in an HHS Action to Collect Civil Penalties
In Texas Tobacco Barn v. HHS, No. 25-60200 (5th Cir. June 30, 2026), a 2-1 panel holds that a manufacturer of vape products was entitled to a jury trial in an Article III court when the U.S. Department of…
Seventh Circuit Holds That “Local Event or Occurrence” Exception in Class Action Fairness Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(11)(B)(ii)(I), Is Jurisdictional and Thus Non-Waivable, Even If Omitted from Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand
In Craig v City of Richmond, Ind., No. 26-1864 (7th Cir. June 18, 2026), in an issue of first impression, the panel holds that a district court may sua sponte remand a removed case to state court under the…
Even Where the Underlying Defense Is Qualified Immunity, There is No Collateral-Order Appeal from a District Court’s Denying a Dispositive Motion That Exceeds the Page Limits Set by Local Rules, Holds Tenth Circuit
In Jefferson v. Moore, No. 25-3020 (10th Cir. June 5, 2026), the Tenth Circuit dismisses an appeal of a qualified immunity defense where the district court “denied the motion without prejudice” because “Defendants’ motion exceeded the page limits set…
District Court’s Failure to Adjudicate Qualified Immunity “At the Earliest Possible Stage in the Litigation” Subject to Appeal Under Collateral-Order Doctrine, Holds Fifth Circuit
In Wertenbroch v. Hardeman, No. 25-40616 (5th Cir. June 3, 2026), the Fifth Circuit holds that even a non-response by a district court to a motion for qualified immunity can serve as an “implicit denial . . . that…
Divided Sixth Circuit Panel Queries Diversity Jurisdiction in Case Against a Lloyd’s of London “Syndicate” of Underwriters
In Halbower v. Hiscox Syndicate 33 of Lloyd’s of London, No. 25-1152 (6th Cir. May 29, 2026), the panel unanimously remands an insurance dispute to reconsider diversity jurisdiction where the defendant is a Lloyd’s of London “Syndicate,” an unincorporated…
“Administrative Termination” of a Post-Judgment Motion Did Not “Dispos[e] Of” It for Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(A) Tolling Purposes, Holds Eleventh Circuit
In Khatabi v. Car Auto Holdings LLC, No. 24-12573 (11th Cir. May 28, 2026), the Eleventh Circuit holds that the “administrative termination” of a Fed. R. Civ. P. 50 and 59 motions to facilitate a post-trial mediation was not…
While Noting That the District Court Legally Erred in Its CAFA Remand, the Sixth Circuit Nevertheless Holds That the Defendant Forfeited Its Chance to Timely Challenge the Order
In Ewalt v. GateHouse Media Ohio Holdings, No. 25-4015 (6th Cir. May 22, 2026), the Sixth Circuit agrees with the defendant that the district court ought not have remanded this CAFA (Class Action Fairness Act) case after denying class…