Be careful of the memes you share with your friends.
Professor Shaun Martin is an academic and legal commentator who publishes detailed analyses of recent court opinions, primarily focusing on appellate decisions in California and federal courts. His writings explore complex legal issues such as family law disputes involving reproductive technology, contempt proceedings, antitrust litigation, firearms law, neighbor disputes, and tax-related challenges. He provides critical insights into judicial reasoning, statutory interpretation, and procedural nuances, often highlighting contrasting judicial approaches and the implications of legal rulings. His content is aimed at legal professionals and scholars interested in contemporary case law developments and their broader legal context.
Be careful of the memes you share with your friends.
…
Do you long for those halcyon days of first-year (and/or advanced) Civil Procedure? Do you feel compelled to get a daily dose of Pennoyer v. Neff, the intricacies of in rem jurisdiction, and the complex principles of territorial sovereignty?…
Here’s a line you don’t see that often:”Defendant was 75 years old when he committed his crimes in September 2009. . . .”You wouldn’t think that’d be a murder or anything like that, and it’s not. “Defendant was convicted…
Judge Bea begins this opinion with:”For years, Naum Morgovsky smuggled components for
night-vision and thermal-vision rifle scopes into Russia and
laundered the proceeds of his illicit enterprise through a
network of offshore banks. But federal investigators
eventually got Morgovsky in
It’s a standard sentiment, held by a nontrivial number of people, and succinctly summarized by the phrase: “F***ing Kaiser.” (For a slightly longer diatribe with additional obscenities, see here. Thank you, Helen Hunt.)That feeling typically arises out of a…
This is a long (88-page, single spaced) immigration opinion. The majority opinion is written by Judge Paez, and the dissent by Judge Bumatay. So you can probably accurately figure out which way it ends up.For a very brief description…
My congratulations to Judge Nelson on this opinion.It’s extremely well-written. It flows gracefully. It explains things well. It’s careful and refined.Here are the first several paragraphs:”Bankruptcy proceedings differ from traditional civil
cases we more often hear. Bankruptcy proceedings can…
I know I say this — or something like this — a lot. But it still seems to me like it’s a total waste.The murder here was in 1978. Nearly a half-century ago. Admittedly, it took a while (almost exclusively,…
This is a really smart and well-written opinion by Judge McKeown.
…