Atain Specialty Ins. v. Ne. Mountain Guiding, LLC (D. N.J. 2020)
ATAIN SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO. Plaintiff,
v.
NORTHEAST MOUNTAIN GUIDING, LLC, et al., Defendants.
Case No. 3:16-cv-05129-BRM-LHG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
January 30, 2020
James H. Moss Blogs
Latest from James H. Moss
This is a confusing case concerning whether or not a person is an intendent contractor or employee, has the right to sue the employer and whether the insurance company for the employer must provide coverage because of the confusion
This is a long and complicated case because know one understood what was needed and no one read their insurance policy.
Atain Specialty Ins Co v Ne Mountain Guiding LLC D NJ 2020
State: New Jersey, US District Court for
Lukken v. Fleischer, 962 N.W.2d 71 (Iowa 2021)
962 N.W.2d 71
Thomas LUKKEN, Appellant,
v.
Korby L. FLEISCHER, individually and d/b/a Mt. Crescent Ski Area ; Samantha Fleischer, individually and d/b/a Mt. Crescent Ski Area; Mt. Crescent Ski Area, an unknown business entity; Safehold Special Risk, Inc., an
Iowa Supreme upholds release for injuries due to an accident on a zip line.
However, case goes to trial based on plaintiffs’ claims of gross negligence, which do not exist under Iowa law?
Lukken v. Fleischer, 962 N.W.2d 71 (Iowa 2021)
State: Iowa, Supreme Court of Iowa
Plaintiff: Thomas Lukken
Defendant: Korby L. FLEISCHER,
Release upheld to stop claims for injuries sustained on a high rope’s course.
Plaintiff’s arguments failed because Colorado is supportive of releases.
Sheldon v. Retreat, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69461 (D. Colo. 2020)
State: Colorado, US District Court for the District of Colorado
Plaintiff: Jodi Sheldon
Defendant: Golden Bell Retreat d/b/a The Colorado
Sheldon v. Retreat, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69461 (D. Colo. 2020)
Sheldon v. Retreat, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69461 (D. Colo. 2020)
JODI SHELDON, Plaintiff,
v.
GOLDEN BELL RETREAT d/b/a THE COLORADO DISTRICT CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE,
d/b/a GOLDEN BELL RANCH and GOLDEN BELL CAMP and CONFERENCE CENTER,
CROSS BEARING ADVENTURES,
Justice v. Marvel, LLC, 965 N.W.2d 335 (Minn. App. 2021)
Justice v. Marvel, LLC, 965 N.W.2d 335 (Minn. App. 2021)
965 N.W.2d 335
Carter JUSTICE, Appellant,
v.
MARVEL, LLC d/b/a Pump It Up Parties, Respondent.
A20-1318
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
Filed July 19, 2021
Granted in part October 19,
Minn. Stat. 184B.20 Inflatable Amusement Equipment (Minnesota Statutes (2022 Edition))
Minn. Stat. 184B.20 Inflatable Amusement Equipment (Minnesota Statutes (2022 Edition))
§ 184B.20. INFLATABLE AMUSEMENT EQUIPMENT
Subdivision 1. Definitions.
(a) For purposes of this section, the terms defined in this subdivision have the meanings given.
(b) “Commercial use” means regular use
Minnesota Appellate court upholds a release signed by a mother for a child’s injuries
Court also upheld the settlement agreement signed by the parents was valid to prohibit a claim by the minor after turning age 18
Justice v. Marvel, LLC, 965 N.W.2d 335 (Minn. App. 2021)
State:Minnesota, Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Plaintiff:
Who Wrote this Article
Sport & Recreation Law Association
Atlanta GA
2022
PowerPoint: Who Wrote This Article
PDF: Who Wrote this Article
Abstract: Who is writing the article