Code of the District of Columbia
Chapter 39. Consumer Protection Procedures.
§ 28–3901. Definitions and purposes. 1
§ 28–3902. Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs as consumer protection agency. 4
§ 28–3903. Powers of the consumer protection agency. 5
§ 28–3904. Unfair or
James H. Moss
Recreation Law is a specialized publisher focusing on legal issues related to outdoor recreation and wilderness activities. It provides analysis and commentary on topics such as risk management, liability, standards of care, and legal cases involving outdoor sports and wilderness medical guidelines. The content often addresses the intersection of law and outdoor safety, including first aid standards in wilderness settings and liability issues in recreational activities like surfing. The publisher also covers organizational governance and board responsibilities within outdoor and scouting organizations. Its audience includes legal professionals, outdoor industry stakeholders, and those interested in the legal aspects of outdoor recreation and wilderness medicine.
Latest from James H. Moss - Page 14
Washington DC consumer law set to suck money from retailers AND manufacturers who sell to Washington DC Residents
My advice. STOP ALL SALES TO WASHINGTON DC RESIDENTS OR WASHINGTON DC ADDRESSES!
The letter below was received from a Georgia cycling store. The letter demands thousands of dollars for violating Washington DC Chapter 39. Consumer Protection Procedures. Allegedly…
One paragraph would have eliminated this lawsuit.
Badly written release and a bad attempt to tie two documents together almost cost the defendant outfitter.
Hamric v. Wilderness Expeditions, Inc
State: Colorado, United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Plaintiff: Alicia Hamric, individually, as representative of the Estate…
Hamric v. Wilderness Expeditions, Inc.,
Hamric v. Wilderness Expeditions, Inc.
ALICIA HAMRIC, individually, as representative of the Estate of Robert Gerald Hamric, and as next friend of Ava Hamric, a minor, Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
WILDERNESS EXPEDITIONS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 20-1250
United States Court of…
N.H. Fish & Game Dep’t v. Bacon, 167 N.H. 591, 116 A.3d 1060, 2015 N.H. LEXIS 34
This is why you should BOYCOTT NEW HAMPSHIRE! Do not recreate in this state.
New Hampshire charges for Search & Rescue. To be able to charge it must prove you were negligent. If you get hurt or need rescued you are NEGLIGENT in New Hampshire.
N.H. Fish & Game Dep’t v. Bacon, 167 N.H.
Forum non conveniens is a legal term meaning the place where the litigation is occurring is not the right place for the lawsuit to occur.
In this case a mountain bike manufacturer sued in California by a Canadian plaintiff for an accident in Canada used the rule to move the case to Canada.
It did not hurt the manufacturer that the plaintiff was playing games…
Fox Factory, Inc v. The Superior Court of Santa Clara County, 11 Cal.App.5th 197, 217 Cal.Rptr.3d 366
Fox Factory, Inc v. The Superior Court of Santa Clara County, 11 Cal.App.5th 197, 217 Cal.Rptr.3d 366
11 Cal.App.5th 197
217 Cal.Rptr.3d 366
Fox Factory, Inc., Petitioner,
v.
The Superior Court of Santa Clara County, Respondent; PETER ISHERWOOD, Real Party…
Washington Appellate court reviews release law in 2021 and the requirements on when a release is ambiguous and/or conspicuous.
Like most other states, if you signed the release, you read and agree to the release. However, that is about the only similarity to release law in other states as pointed out in this decision.
McCoy v. PFWA Lacey, LLC…
McCoy v. PFWA Lacey, LLC, dba Planet Fitness,
McCoy v. PFWA Lacey, LLC, dba Planet Fitness,
Carol J. McCoy, a single person, Respondent,
PFWA Lacey, LLC, a Washington limited company, dba Planet Fitness, Petitioner,
and
BRUNSWICK CORPORATION, a foreign corporation, Defendant.
No. 54400-8-II
Court of Appeals of Washington,…