I previously wrote about a Middle District of Florida Court invalidating one FairWarning IP’s patents at the pleading stage. There, the Court determined the asserted patent (U.S. Patent 8,578,500) was invalid because it was directed only an abstract
Shutts & Bowen, LLP
Shutts & Bowen LLP is a full-service business law firm with approximately 280 attorneys across eight offices in Florida. Established in 1910, the firm provides a broad range of legal services to business clients and individuals locally, nationally, and internationally. Its publications include legal analyses and updates on topics such as intellectual property, litigation, corporate law, and regulatory matters. The firm addresses practical legal issues including trademark enforcement, patent and trademark deadline extensions, service of process, case management during crises, and injunction modifications. Shutts & Bowen's content reflects its focus on business law and litigation within the Florida region and beyond.
Website:
https://shutts.com
Latest from Shutts & Bowen, LLP - Page 5
Middle District of Florida Releases New Discovery Handbook
The Handbook on Civil Discovery Practice has been revised (dated June 5, 2015). You may download a copy here. (You may receive a printed copy at the Intake counter in each divisional Clerk’s office.) It’s a good idea to…
Fraud Detection in Patient Records Patent — Is it Patent-Eligible?
“In other words, Claim 1 comprises…” Perhaps the most dangerous words in a court opinion directed to the patent eligibility of a challenged patent. I say dangerous because essentially any patent claim can be presented “in other words” in order…
Are the Kardashians’ European Activities Beyond The Reach of a U.S. Court?
Nope.Lee Tillett owns U.S. Trademark No. 4079066 for KROMA in connection with cosmetics. Tillett exclusively licensed the mark to Kroma Makeup EU, LLC (“Kroma EU”) granting Kroma EU the right to import, distribute, and sell products using the mark in…
Staying Litigation Because of Request for Inter Partes Review?
Not yet. The request is premature until the Patent Office determines whether or not to institute the Inter Partes Review (“IPR”).TAS Energy, Inc. sued Stellar Energy Americas, Inc. for patent infringement concerning U.S. RE 44,815. TAS and Stellar are…