Insurance policies sometimes contain exclusions purporting to bar damage that began before the policy effective dates, but continues into the policy period.
That is what happened in Northfield Mass. Assocs., LLC v. Travelers Indem. Co.
In this case, the insured
On March 6, 2026, Brandon Lord, a U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) official who, inter alia, leads CBP’s strategic efforts to enforce and protect tariff revenue, submitted a declaration to the U.S. Court of International Trade outlining a proposed
On March 6, 2026, Judge Richard Eaton of the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT or Court) held a closed conference in Atmus Filtration, Inc. vs. United States, to continue the Court’s process in determining how the International Economic Emergency Powers
We previously discussed whether lawyers can withdraw from a representation simply because they want to and withdrawing would not have a materially adverse impact on the client (think hot potato). But what happens when the lawyer is representing
Eden Owners Association, Inc. sued General Security Indemnity Company of Arizona, HDI Global Specialty SE, StarStone Specialty Insurance Company, and QBE Specialty Insurance Company in the Northern District of Florida, invoking diversity jurisdiction and venue based on insured property in
On March 4, 2026, in Atmus Filtration, Inc. vs. United States, Judge Richard Eaton of the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued an order, referencing the U.S. Supreme Court’s February 20, 2026 ruling in Learning Resources, Inc. v.
On March 2, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) issued a per curiam order granting the plaintiffs’ February 24, 2026 motion in V.O.S. Selections v. Donald J. Trump, et al. to immediately issue the
In a 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not grant the president power to impose tariffs. In response, President Donald Trump issued a temporary 10% tariff on
On February 20, 2026, lead counsel for the plaintiff group in the test case for the China Section 301 tariff refund litigation (HMTX Industries LLC, et al. v. United States et al.), filed a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari
On February 20, 2026, in response to the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling that tariffs under the International Economic Emergency Powers Act (IEEPA) are illegal (see Thompson Hine Update of February 20, 2026), Ambassador Jamieson Greer, the U.S. Trade Representative,
