Two rocket companies walk into an antitrust review. They leave as a de facto monopoly. And somehow, the punchline may be that this was good for consumers, taxpayers, and maybe even competition.
A little context. In 2006, Boeing and Lockheed
Truth on the Market is a publication that focuses on the intersection of law and economics, particularly in areas such as competition law, regulatory policy, and institutional analysis. It often features in-depth discussions on legal frameworks governing markets, including topics like EU competition law, broadcasting regulations, sports governance, and the economic implications of legal rules. The content typically explores how legal institutions and economic principles interact to shape market behavior, enforcement challenges, and policy reforms. The publication serves as a platform for scholarly and policy-oriented analysis relevant to legal practitioners, economists, and policymakers interested in the economic dimensions of law.
Spirit Airlines was supposed to be the competitor antitrust law saved. Instead, it may become the cautionary tale antitrust law cannot quite avoid.
The carrier’s disappearance has transformed the JetBlue-Spirit merger litigation from an ordinary postmortem into a test case…
California has seen the future of work, and Sacramento’s first instinct is to convene 14 task forces about it.
Gov. Gavin Newsom signed Executive Order N-6-26 today, setting California’s workforce agencies in motion on directives involving research reviews, revisions to…
The Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) rulemaking machinery is humming again. Is it being tuned for optimal performance—or revved for another trip into the ditch?
Most of the current action has to do with consumer protection. That’s par for the course,…
Regulators keep warning that AI markets are about to be captured by Big Tech. The awkward fact is that AI markets keep refusing to cooperate. Several years into the generative-AI boom, the sector still looks less like a coronation than…
The local news business has spent the past two decades being “saved” by people who mostly seem to want it embalmed. Every new shift in how Americans consume information—websites, social feeds, newsletters, podcasts, short-form video, artificial-intelligence summaries—gets treated less like…
The government does not need to burn books when it can threaten licenses. Why bother with an inquisitor’s bonfire when a regulator’s raised eyebrow can do the trick?
That is the modern First Amendment problem. Censorship no longer arrives only…
Consumer protection often begins with a simple question: Can the consumer walk away? If the answer is no—because switching is hard, data are locked up, markets are fragmented, or new competitors cannot enter—then the problem is not just weak consumer…