The California Supreme Court handed down its long-awaited decision in Gilead Tenofovir Cases yesterday, and as we hoped, the Court held that a drug manufacturer owes no duty of care when deciding whether and when to develop an allegedly safer
Drug & Device Law
The definitive source for intelligent commentary on the law that matters for drug and device product liability cases
Drug & Device Law is a blog published by the Drug & Device Law Blogging Team that focuses on legal issues surrounding prescription drugs and medical devices. It covers topics such as product liability litigation, regulatory compliance, FDA approval processes, preemption doctrines, class action lawsuits, and statutes of limitations relevant to drug and device manufacturers. The blog discusses court decisions involving manufacturing defects, failure to warn claims, fraudulent joinder and misjoinder, and pricing program litigation like the 340B drug pricing program. It also addresses procedural and jurisdictional issues in multidistrict litigation and state versus federal court matters related to drug and device law.
Latest from Drug & Device Law - Page 3
Medical Monitoring and the Limits to Equity
We recently became aware of a legal podcast comment about the incompatibility of medical monitoring claims and the availability of equitable relief (at least in federal court) under Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo S.A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc., 527 U.S.…
702 Exclusion in the Zimmer Taper Hip MDL
Today’s post is from the Zimmer hip prothesis MDL, which appears to be winding down and which we’ve blogged about here. It’s a Rule 702 decision that excluded a treating surgeon who offered unsupported expert opinions about an alleged…
Now THAT Is A Case Vetting Order
News about the long‑running talc MDL has developed since, but the opinion we discuss today (In re Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Prods. Mktg., Sales Pracs., & Prods. Liab. Litig., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162870, 2026 LX 335455, 2026 WL…
Tenth Circuit Holds that PREP Act Preempts Vaccine Breach of Contract Claim
Dressen v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, 2026 WL 2122898(10th Cir. July 23, 2026), extends to four weeks our streak of discussing favorable vaccine decisions – this time involving product liability.
In a well written, fully reasoned, reported decision, the Tenth Circuit…
You Can’t Teach an Old Complaint New Tricks
If you share your life with a dog, you know the drill. You call them by a hundred names. You talk to them like they understand every word (they might). You make decisions about their health with the same care…
New WLF Paper on the First Amendment as a Defense to Public Nuisance
We first learned of the Washington Legal Foundations (“WLF”) back in the 1990s, when Bexis collaborated with WLF in pursuing what was then viewed as a rather radical proposition – that the First Amendment applied to FDA and other governmental…
Third Circuit Vacates Avandia Class Cert—Correlation Is Not Causation
The order certifying a class of third-party payors in the long-running Avandia MDL was the wrong result for the wrong reasons, and the Third Circuit has now vacated that order in an opinion that is well worth the read. In…
Second Circuit Disappoints With Big Reversal
As we have said before, the Blog is unabashedly pro-science. There is a difference between good science and bad science, and reliance on the latter to make any important decision—be it in everyday life, litigation, or public policy—is not…
Eleventh Circuit Upholds Airline Employee Vaccine Requirement
By taking a look at Akerlund v. Atlas Air, Inc., 2026 WL 1993146 (11th Cir. July 10, 2026), that makes this the third straight week in which we are pleased with a sensible vaccine decision. In this published case, the Eleventh…