Similar to its federal counterpart, Indiana Rule of Evidence 806 provides that
When a hearsay statement or a statement described in Rule 801 (d)(2)(C), (D), or (E) has been admitted in evidence, the declarant’s credibility may be
The EvidenceProf Blog, published by the Law Professor Blogs Network, focuses on issues related to the rules and application of evidence law in various legal contexts. It covers topics such as the admissibility of evidence, evidentiary standards like the best evidence rule, and procedural aspects of evidence in criminal and civil trials. The blog also discusses judicial interpretations of evidentiary doctrines, including transferred intent and self-defense, as well as critiques of evidentiary rules affecting jury deliberations and trial fairness. It addresses both federal and state court decisions, highlighting practical implications for litigators, judges, and scholars interested in evidence law.
Similar to its federal counterpart, Indiana Rule of Evidence 806 provides that
When a hearsay statement or a statement described in Rule 801 (d)(2)(C), (D), or (E) has been admitted in evidence, the declarant’s credibility may be…
The Confrontation Clause provides that “[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right…to be confronted with the witnesses against him.” So, can this right to confrontation be satisfied by a witness for the prosecution concealing his identity with…
Last Tuesday, a jury found Edrick Faust guilty of 12 charges in connection with the murder and aggravated sodomy of University of Georgia law student Tara Baker. At the very start of the trial, during opening statements, defense counsel Ahmad…
Federal Rule of Evidence 408(a) provides as follows
(a) Prohibited Uses. Evidence of the following is not admissible — on behalf of any party — either to prove or disprove the validity or amount of a disputed claim or to…
Last year, we investigated and reported on Amanda Lewis case on the Undisclosed Podcast. During the course of our coverage, we presented four possible grounds for reversing Amanda’s convictions connected to the drowning death of her daughter, Adrianna. These…
In its recent opinion in State v. Stone, 2026 WL 202095 (Md. 2026), the Supreme Court of Maryland noted the following about the state’s Transportation Code:
TR § 21-1124.1(b) prohibits a person from writing, sending, or reading a text…
While most states do not allow for a voluntary intoxication defense, most states do allow for an involuntary intoxication defense. Such a defense applies when a defendant unknowingly ingests alcohol or drugs to the point of intoxication (e.g., a roommate…
Should a defendant be entitled to a new trial when the case agent baselessly testifies at trial that his alleged co-conspirator and he “may even have been lovers” despite the defendant seeking to distance himself from the co-conspirator? That was…
A topic that I’ve written about on this blog for more than a decade is the troubling trend of prosecutors introducing rap lyrics authored by defendants to prove that they committed crimes. That latest court to address the issue, albeit…
It’s pretty rare for an appellate court to reverse a trial court’s ruling deeming expert opinion testimony inadmissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 702. That makes the recent opinion of the Seventh Circuit in Hillman v. Toro Company,…