Federal Rule of Evidence 701 provides that
If a witness is not testifying as an expert, testimony in the form of an opinion is limited to one that is:
(a) rationally based on the witness’s perception;
(b) helpful to clearly
The EvidenceProf Blog, published by the Law Professor Blogs Network, focuses on issues related to the rules and application of evidence law in various legal contexts. It covers topics such as the admissibility of evidence, evidentiary standards like the best evidence rule, and procedural aspects of evidence in criminal and civil trials. The blog also discusses judicial interpretations of evidentiary doctrines, including transferred intent and self-defense, as well as critiques of evidentiary rules affecting jury deliberations and trial fairness. It addresses both federal and state court decisions, highlighting practical implications for litigators, judges, and scholars interested in evidence law.
Federal Rule of Evidence 701 provides that
If a witness is not testifying as an expert, testimony in the form of an opinion is limited to one that is:
(a) rationally based on the witness’s perception;
(b) helpful to clearly…
The recent opinion of the Supreme Court of Kansas in State v. Trickle, 2026 WL 2672272 (Kan. 2026) starts with this provocative paragraph:
Was Kristen Trickle murdered in her sleep by her husband, Colby Trickle? Or did she commit…
As we just saw with the Lindsay Clancy case, juries can deadlock, leading to a hung jury and a mistrial. So, what should happen when the jury sends a note that they’re deadlocked to the judge, who responds with a…
In United States v. Davis, 15 F.3d 1393, 1402–03 (7th Cir.1994), found that the prosecutor’s references to the defendant’s case as “hogwash,” “trash,” and “garbage” did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial. Would the same hold for…
Federal Rule of Evidence 901(b)(4) provides that an item of evidence can be authenticated through
(4) Distinctive Characteristics and the Like. The appearance, contents, substance, internal patterns, or other distinctive characteristics of the item, taken together with all the circumstances.…
Federal Rule of Evidence 901(a) provides that
To satisfy the requirement of authenticating or identifying an item of evidence, the proponent must produce evidence sufficient to support a finding that the item is what the proponent claims it is.
Moreover,…
Guest post by Jon Polenberg
Professor Miller was kind enough to invite me to share a few thoughts here, and I want to use the space to make an argument about Proposed Federal Rule of Evidence 707 that I develop…
It’s really rare that a court reverses a murder conviction based upon finding a confession to be involuntary. That makes the recent opinion of the Supreme Court of Tennessee in State v. Adkisson, 2026 WL 1542890 (Tenn. 2026), the…
The Supreme Court has held that a criminal defendant “being tried by a jury is entitled to the uncoerced verdict of that body.” Lowenfield v. Phelps, 484 U.S. 231, 241 (1988). It’s rare for an appellate court to find…
It is well established that judges wield the inherent power of the court. This was the power wielded in the Terrance Lewis case which we covered on Undisclosed. As I wrote in my article, Rectifying Wrongful Convictions Through the…