In January 2025, Covington issued a client alert noting that the National Defense Authorization Act (“NDAA”) for Fiscal Year (“FY”) 2025, which sets annual spending and policy for the Pentagon, introduced new China-related prohibitions on defense contractors and their
Inside Government Contracts
Procurement Law and Policy Insights
Inside Government Contracts, published by Covington & Burling LLP, focuses on legal and regulatory developments affecting government contractors. The blog covers topics such as bid protest trends and outcomes, changes in procurement regulations including Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) and Truthful Cost or Pricing Data Act (TINA) thresholds, legislative updates impacting government contracting like the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), and compliance issues related to domestic sourcing and trade agreements. It also addresses emerging concerns in government procurement such as biotechnology supply chain restrictions and agency enforcement actions. The blog serves as a resource for understanding the intersection of federal acquisition policies, contract disputes, and regulatory compliance.
Latest from Inside Government Contracts - Page 4
GAO Scrutinizes DoD Civilian Workforce Cuts: What the Report Means for Federal Contractors
The Government Accountability Office recently issued a report on the Department of Defense’s civilian workforce reductions. It offers a concrete record of how DoD has reduced staffing, where those reductions have occurred, and how the Department has assessed their effects.…
White House Releases Executive Order on Advanced AI Innovation and Security
On June 2, 2026, the White House issued an executive order titled “Promoting Advanced Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Security” (the “Order”). The Order reflects the Administration’s stated policy of advancing U.S. leadership in artificial intelligence (“AI”) while addressing…
Proposed Rule Would Fundamentally Impact Federal Grant and Financial Assistance Framework
On May 29, 2026, the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”), together with several other federal agencies, published a proposed rule that would fundamentally change many aspects of the regulations in 2 CFR Part 200 governing federal financial assistance awards,…
From Paper Reform to Practice: How Agencies Are Actually Implementing the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul
Over one year ago, on May 2, 2025, the FAR Council took the first concrete step in the administration’s “Revolutionary FAR Overhaul” (“RFO”) initiative by issuing the initial round of rolling model deviation guidance—a deliberate move to translate reform of…
The Pentagon’s New Sub-Unified Command for Autonomous Warfare: What It Means and Where It Might Land
On April 29, 2026, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth told the House Armed Services Committee that the Pentagon will “shortly announce a sub-unified command of autonomous warfare.” The announcement came as the Department of War (DoW) unveiled its fiscal year…
The New Executive Order on “Promoting Efficiency, Accountability, and Performance in Federal Contracting”: What Federal Contractors Need to Know
On April 30, 2026, President Trump issued an Executive Order (EO) titled, “Promoting Efficiency, Accountability, and Performance in Federal Contracting.” This EO directs agencies to make fixed-price contracts the default form of contracting, and requires agency officials to…
SBIR/STTR Is Back and the Department of War Is Wasting No Time
On April 20, 2026, one week after President Trump signed the Small Business Innovation and Economic Security Act (Public Law 119-83) into law, the Department of War (“DoW”) issued a press release announcing that it was “immediately advancing” a “redesigned…
Revolutionary FAR Overhaul Incorporates New “Addressing DEI Discrimination” Executive Order Provisions
As we previously covered, on March 26, 2026, President Trump issued Executive Order (EO) 14398, “Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors,” to address “racially discriminatory DEI activities” in federal contracting. Among other things, EO 14398 directed the…
Indirect Doesn’t Mean Exempt: ASBCA Rejects Cross‑Motions Over U.S.-Flag Transportation Costs
The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals’ (ASBCA) decision in Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co., ASBCA No. 63621, reinforces a critical principle for government contractors: contract performance requirements operate independently of cost accounting classifications. Contractors cannot avoid substantive FAR and…