Skip to main content

Blog

IP Intelligence

By Baker & Hostetler LLP Visit the blog

648 published works

  1. IP Intelligence

    Patent Watch: Cheese Sys., Inc. v. Tetra Pak Cheese and Powder Sys., Inc.

    By Dr. Lawrence M. Sung

    Where a court holds a claim obvious without making findings of secondary considerations, the lack of specific consideration of secondary considerations ordinarily requires a remand. On August 6, 2013, in…

  2. IP Intelligence

    Patent Watch: Rembrandt Vision Techs., Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.

    By Dr. Lawrence M. Sung

    An expert witness may not testify to subject matter beyond the scope of the witness's expert report unless the failure to include that information in the report was "substantially justified…

  3. IP Intelligence

    Patent Watch: Rembrandt Vision Techs., Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.

    By Dr. Lawrence M. Sung

    An expert witness may not testify to subject matter beyond the scope of the witness's expert report unless the failure to include that information in the report was "substantially justified…

  4. IP Intelligence

    Patent Watch: Apple, Inc. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n

    By Dr. Lawrence M. Sung

    [E]vidence relating to all four Graham factors -- including objective evidence of secondary considerations -- must be considered before determining whether the claimed invention would have been obvious to one…

  5. IP Intelligence

    Instagram Federal Class Action Over User Terms Dismissed; Plaintiffs Switch to State Court

    By Alan M. Pate

    Earlier this month, Judge William Alsop of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed a proposed class action lawsuit against Instagram. The complaint alleged that certain…

  6. IP Intelligence

    Patent Watch: Novozymes A/S v. DuPont Nutrition Biosciences APS

    By Dr. Lawrence M. Sung

    "[T]he written description requirement prohibits a patentee from 'leaving it to the . . . industry to complete an unfinished invention.'" On July 22, 2013, in Novozymes A/S v. DuPont…

  7. IP Intelligence

    Leave It to Hollywood: No D&O Insurance Coverage for Failure to Pay Leave It to Beaver Television Royalties

    By Maryanne Stanganelli

     Authored by: Judy A. Selby and C. Zachary Rosenberg On July 11, 2013, the Central District of California held that a liability insurer is not required to reimburse its insured…

  8. IP Intelligence

    Patent Watch: In re Adler

    By Dr. Lawrence M. Sung

    When the Board relies upon a new ground of rejection not relied upon by the examiner, the applicant is entitled to reopen prosecution or to request a rehearing [unless the…

  9. IP Intelligence

    Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, Inc. et al. – Supreme Court Holds Reverse Payment Settlement Agreements to be Analyzed under “Rule of Reason” Approach

    By Jason Oliver

    On June 17, 2013, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled 5-3 in favor of the Federal Trade Commission and issued its long-awaited decision in Federal Trade Commission v.…

  10. IP Intelligence

    Patent Watch: Ass’n for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.

    By Dr. Lawrence M. Sung

    A naturally occurring DNA segment is a product of nature and not patent eligible merely because it has been isolated, but cDNA is patent eligible because it is not naturally…