You are reading a brief and something seems off. The cases are real. The citations check out. There is no reference to a decision from a court that does not exist. But you know.
They used AI.
Or do you?
Artificial Intelligence not only requires practitioners to adapt their methodology and strategy—it also demands that the rules governing our practice shift as well.
Changing core procedural rules, like the Federal Rules of Evidence, is never easy, but staying informed and
Geopolitical tensions–trade wars, sanctions and strategic competition–increasingly disrupt commercial contracts, generate disputes and complicate enforcement. This three-part blog post series examines where risks arise and how parties can manage them in an arbitration context.
When Geopolitics Disrupt The Deal: How
On June 29, 2026, the Supreme Court agreed to hear a trademark dispute between RiseandShine Corporation, doing business as Rise Brewing, and PepsiCo, Inc. over Pepsi’s “Mtn Dew Rise Energy” drink. The Court granted cert on whether judges or juries
Generative artificial intelligence tools have quickly become part of everyday legal practice. Lawyers are using these tools to draft briefs, summarize cases, and streamline research. But as recent cases make clear, those efficiencies come with a serious risk: sometimes, AI
On April 14, 2026, United States Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana (the “Court”) entered an order in connection with certain unresolved discovery disputes in White v. Walmart, Case
Put “quantum” in front of almost anything and it tends to evoke a singular reaction: it must be highly technical, theoretical, or out of reach. But when it comes to “quantum computing” – especially the business of quantum computing –
On December 9, 2025, the Paris Court of Appeal rendered what should be the ultimate decision in the Sultan of Sulu saga, annulling the final arbitral award that had purported to order Malaysia to pay US$ 14.92 billion to
At the end of 2025, amendments were made to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that fundamentally change when and how litigators must address privilege issues in federal court. These amendments followed an important decision in the Sixth Circuit in
In the recent decision in Guy Carpenter & Company Ltd v Willis Re (UK) Ltd [2026] EWHC 361 (KB), the High Court considered a series of claims between two competitor reinsurance brokers arising from a major team move of 22 employees,
