A trademark opposition may be filed based on one of several grounds. This includes that the mark is merely descriptive and should be refused registration pursuant to Section 2(e)(1) of the Trademark Act.
A trademark is assessed on a continuum
The Trademark Opposition Lawyer blog, published by Practus, LLP, focuses on legal issues surrounding trademark opposition and related trademark disputes. It covers topics such as likelihood of confusion analyses, trademark cancellation and expungement proceedings, statutory requirements for opposition, and defenses like the Morehouse defense. The blog discusses case outcomes involving trademark registrations for various goods and services, including apparel, audio products, and charitable organizations. It also addresses procedural aspects of trademark trials before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, evidentiary rules, and strategic considerations for trademark owners and applicants. The content is aimed at providing practical insights into trademark opposition litigation and trademark law enforcement.
A trademark opposition may be filed based on one of several grounds. This includes that the mark is merely descriptive and should be refused registration pursuant to Section 2(e)(1) of the Trademark Act.
A trademark is assessed on a continuum…
A motion for summary judgment in a trademark opposition or trademark cancellation proceeding before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) can be an effective strategy. Summary judgment motions are often are filed near or at the end of discovery,…
A recent trademark opposition decision by the U.S. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board is an example in how an Opposer should properly establish use analogous to trademark use.
In Dexas International, Ltd v. Ideavillage Products Corp., the Opposer filed…
A recent trademark cancellation action by Major League Baseball against an individual who had a registration for sports apparel is another victory for well-established brand names.
In Major League Baseball Properties, Inc. v. Christopher Webb, MLB petitioned to cancel…
Prevailing in a TTAB opposition proceeding against a food and beverage company proves to be sweet for the makers of Nutella.
In Ferrero S.p.A. v. Ruchi Soya Industries Limited, Ferrero, who is the owner of the NUTELLA spread brand,…
No likelihood of confusion this time as the TTAB finds beer and wine to be unrelated goods.
In Justin Vineyards & Winery LLC v. Crooked Stave, LLC, Applicant Crooked Stave, LLC sought registration of the word mark HOP SAVANT,…
A recent trademark opposition is a lesson in what happens when there is a crowded field of similar trademarks.
In Inter-Industry Conference on Auto Collision Repair v. LM Industries Group, Inc., Applicant sought registration of the mark ICAR or land…
More than 5,000 trademark oppositions are filed every year.
One of the grounds for bringing a trademark opposition is that the application is likely to cause confusion with the Opposer’s preexisting trademark.
Yet many trademark opposers are unsuccessful and…