Skip to main content

Statute

CEQA

1,311 published works

  1. CEQA Developments

    Petitions for Review Filed In Brown Act/CEQA Exemption Case

    By Arthur F. Coon

    On December 5, 2022, the real party in interest (Arakelian Enterprises, Inc. dba Athens Services) and respondent City of Thousand Oaks both filed petitions for review in the California Supreme…

  2. CEQA Developments

    Second District Denies Rehearing and Modifies Opinion In Brown Act/CEQA Exemption Case; CSAC and Solano County Seek Depublication In Supreme Court

    By Arthur F. Coon

    The Second District Court of Appeal (Div. 6) has issued a November 22, 2022 Order modifying its opinion and denying rehearing in G.I. Industries v. City of Thousand Oaks (2022)…

  3. CEQA Chronicles

    Local Agency Violated the Brown Act by Failing to Properly Agendize CEQA Exemption

    By Dustin D. Peterson

    *Note - On February 15, 2023, the California Supreme Court denied petitions for review that were filed by the City of Thousand Oaks and the Real Party in Interest in…

  4. Administrative and Regulatory

    Local Agency Violated the Brown Act by Failing to Properly Agendize CEQA Exemption

    By Dustin D. Peterson

    *Note - On February 15, 2023, the California Supreme Court denied petitions for review that were filed by the City of Thousand Oaks and the Real Party in Interest in…

  5. CEQA Developments

    Attorney General’s Guidance On “Best Practices” For CEQA Analysis Of And Mitigation For Wildfire-Related Impacts Is Long On Litigation And Policy Advocacy, Short On Neutral Legal Analysis

    By Arthur F. Coon, Matthew C. Henderson

    “We didn’t start the fire….” -Billy Joel Wildfires are an unfortunate reality of life in California and have become of increasing concern over the past several years.  Eight of the…

  6. Administrative and Regulatory

    Discretionary Reductions in Water Deliveries Allowed Under Terms of Existing Leases are not a New CEQA Project

    By Samuel D. Bacal-Graves

    In County of Mono v. City of Los Angeles (2022) 81 Cal.App.5th 657, the First District Court of Appeal held that a reduction in water deliveries by the City of Los…

  7. Administrative and Regulatory

    Residential Development Project Consistent with Specific Plan Found Exempt from Further CEQA Review

    By Megan V. Unger, Kathryn L. Oehlschlager

    In Citizens’ Committee to Complete the Refuge v. City of Newark (2021) 74 Cal.App.5th 460, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s ruling that a residential project…

  8. CEQA Chronicles

    2022’s New State Housing Laws

    By Dustin D. Peterson

    This week Governor Newsom signed a series of bills intended to accelerate housing development in California. Two bills – AB 2011 and SB 6 – seek to facilitate residential redevelopment…

  9. Environmental and Climate

    Court Holds CEQA Is Not Preempted in Federal Hydroelectric Relicensing Proceeding

    By Tiffanie Ellis, Brian T. Cragg

      In County of Butte v. Dep’t of Wat. Resources (2022) 13 Cal.5th 612, issued on August 1, 2022, the California Supreme Court carved out a role for the California…

  10. Environmental and Climate

    Third District Invalidates Water Bottling Facility EIR for Overly Narrow Project Objectives and Failure to Recirculate

    By Breana M. Inoshita, Christian L. Marsh, Jennie Woo

    On April 20, 2022, the Third District Court of Appeal filed its opinion in We Advocate Through Environmental Review v. County of Siskiyou (2022) 78 Cal.App.5th 683, reversing the trial…