Skip to main content

Statute

CEQA

1,312 published works

  1. CEQA Developments

    First District Holds U.C. Berkeley Campus’s Decision To Increase Student Enrollment Above Maximum Projected Level Analyzed In EIR for Long Range Development Plan Is A “Project” Under CEQA And Not Exempt Under Public Resources Code § 21089.09

    By Arthur F. Coon

    In a partially published opinion filed June 25, 2020, the First District Court of Appeal (Division 5) reversed the trial court’s judgment entered after sustaining a demurrer without leave to…

  2. California Land Use & Development Law Report

    University Campus Was Not an Illusory Element of Project Under CEQA

    By Lucille Flinchbaugh

    The court of appeal found the EIR for a master planned community sufficient because it adequately described and analyzed impacts of the proposed project, which included a university, and was…

  3. California Land Use & Development Law Report

    Agency Actions to Implement a Previously-Approved Project Are Not Subsequent Discretionary Approvals Requiring Supplemental Environmental Review

    By Perkins Coie

    After a public agency approves a project, the agency’s actions to implement the project—in this case, applying for and accepting a streambed alteration agreement from the California Department of Fish…

  4. Unfamiliar Terrain

    Land Use Litigation Statute of Limitations Tolling Period to End on August 3, 2020

    By Coblentz Land Use Team

    On May 29, 2020, the Judicial Council of California amended Rule No. 9 of its COVID-19 emergency regulations to add certainty and to shorten the tolling period for civil causes…

  5. CEQA Developments

    Sixth District Holds City Of San Jose’s Action In Seeking And Accepting Streambed Alteration Agreement From California Department Of Fish And Wildlife Is Not New Discretionary Approval For City’s Historic Trestle Demolition/Bridge Construction Project, And Thus Does Not Trigger Subsequent CEQA Review

    By Arthur F. Coon

    In a published opinion filed May 18, 2020, the Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s denial of a historic preservation group’s writ petition that challenged the City…

  6. California Land Use & Development Law Report

    Misrepresentations Can Bar Agency’s Reliance on CEQA Statute of Limitations

    By Perkins Coie

    An agency could be equitably estopped from relying on the 35-day statute of limitations applicable to a CEQA Notice of Exemption where the agency had misled the public into expecting…

  7. California Land Use & Development Law Report

    Governor Allows Electronic Noticing Under CEQA and Suspends Tribal Consultation Requirements

    By Perkins Coie

    California Governor Gavin Newsom issued an executive order on April 22 suspending for 60 days (1) the filing, posting, notice, and public access requirements related to certain notices under the…

  8. Real Estate, Land Use & Environmental Law Blog

    Digital CEQA: New Executive Order Creates An Alternative Path For Complying With CEQA Notice, Posting And Public Review Requirements

    By Jeffrey Forrest, Kelsey Clayton

    On April 23, 2020, California Governor Gavin Newsom issued Executive Order N-54-20 (EO) which, in part, addresses an outstanding question related to the California Environmental Quality Act’s (CEQA) “public review”…

  9. Environmental and Climate

    To VMT or not to VMT? Third District Says Level of Service No Longer Valid to Measure Traffic Impacts, But Use of Vehicle Miles Traveled is Not Yet Required

    By Kathryn L. Oehlschlager, Brenda C. Bass

    The Third District Court of Appeals recently weighed in on the interpretation of Public Resources Code section 21099(b)(2) (“Section 21099(b)(2)”) and newly enacted CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, which govern the…

  10. California Land Use & Development Law Report

    Untimely CEQA Suit Barred Regardless of Substantive Merits

    By Lucille Flinchbaugh

    The court of appeal held that CEQA claims filed more than 30 days after the City filed a facially valid Notice of Determination were barred by the statute of limitations…