Skip to main content

Statute

CEQA

1,312 published works

  1. CEQA Developments

    Neither CEQA Administrative Record Preparation Statute nor Case Law Precludes Award of Costs to Prevailing Real Party who Reimburses Lead Agency Its Costs of Record Preparation

    By Arthur F. Coon

    In the published portion of an opinion filed September 12, 2016, the Fifth District Court of Appeal reversed the trial court’s order taxing costs in the amount of $44,889.71 which…

  2. CEQA Developments

    First District Modifies “Reverse CEQA” Case Opinion, Denies BAAQMD’s Petition For Rehearing With No Change In Judgment

    By Arthur F. Coon

    On September 9, 2016, the First District Court of Appeal (Division 5) filed an “Order Modifying Opinion and Denying Rehearing [No Change In Judgment]” in California Building Industry Association v.…

  3. Environmental and Climate

    First Appellate District Upholds Use of Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration for Revisions to Use Permit for Religious Facility, Rejects Claim of General Plan Inconsistency

    By Donald E. Sobelman

    On August 31, the First Appellate District issued its decision in Coastal Hills Rural Preservation v. County of Sonoma, which centered on the applicable standards and appropriateness of proceeding on…

  4. CEQA Developments

    Sixth District Rejects SMARA And CEQA Challenges To Permanente Quarry Reclamation Plan Amendment And Related EIR

    By Arthur F. Coon

    In a published opinion filed August 31, 2016, the Sixth Appellate District Court of Appeal rejected claims under CEQA and the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (“SMARA”; Pub. Resources Code,…

  5. Land Use Developments

    Court Declines to Reweigh Conflicting Evidence, Holds that County Fully Considered its Land Use Policies and Extent to Which Project Conforms to Those Policies

    By Bryan W. Wenter, AICP

    On August 31, 2016, the Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District affirmed a trial court decision denying a petition for writ of mandate filed by a citizens group…

  6. Environmental and Climate

    Second Appellate District Upholds Use of Class 3 Exemption and Rejects Claim That “General Effects” of Operating a Business Constitute Unusual Circumstances

    By Arielle O. Harris

    In its July 21 decision in Walters v. City of Redondo Beach, the Second Appellate District rejected a challenge to the use of a Class 3 categorical exemption for a…

  7. CEQA Developments

    Supreme Court Depublishes Quirky Fourth District CEQA/General Plan Decision

    By Arthur F. Coon

    On August 17, 2016, the California Supreme Court ordered the Fourth District’s opinion in People for Proper Planning v. City of Palm Springs (2016) 247 Cal.App.4th 640 to be depublished,…

  8. Environmental and Climate

    FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT UPHOLDS CITY’S RELIANCE ON CATEGORICAL EXEMPTIONS, PAVING THE WAY FOR PROPOSED ASPHALT PLANT IMPROVEMENTS

    By Thomas Law Group

    BoDean Company, Inc. (“BoDean”) operates an asphalt plant in the City of Santa Rosa. The plant is a vested and legal nonconforming use that has been in continuous operation since…

  9. Administrative and Regulatory

    Sixth Appellate District Adopts Substantial Evidence Standard for Review of Lead Agency Determinations Regarding Historical Resources

    By Donald E. Sobelman

    [caption id="attachment_283" align="aligncenter" width="614"] Willow Glen Trestle Bridge (Photo by Don DeBold, via Flickr)[/caption] In its August 12 decision in Friends of the Willow Glen Trestle v. City of San…

  10. CEQA Developments

    Statutory CEQA Reform Proposal (SB 122) Reemerges With Optional Expedited Record Preparation Provisions Unchanged; Fleshes Out OPR Electronic Database Placeholder; And Drops Controversial Effort To Provide Public Review Period for Final EIRs

    By Arthur F. Coon

    About one year after being placed in the California Legislature’s “Inactive File,” SB 122 (concerning concurrent preparation of the CEQA administrative record and OPR electronic database) is back “off the…