Topic
Article III Standing
144 published works
Hunton Retail Law Resource
Just Browsing? Courts Differ on Whether Website Users Lack Article III Standing for Wiretapping Claims
By Jamie Zysk Isani, Natalia San Juan
Earlier this month, a Pennsylvania federal judge held that users of Bass Pro Shops’ and Cabela’s websites lacked Article III standing to sue the retailers for use of “session replay”…
Paul W. Mollica Federal Courts Blog
Third Circuit Panel Splits Three Ways on Whether and How FDCPA Plaintiff Had Article III Standing Based on Ambiguous Balance Statement
In Huber v. Simons Agency Inc., No. 22-2483 (3d Cir. Oct. 12, 2023), each judge on the panel arrived at a different outcome about whether a plaintiff under the Fair…
Health Law Prof Blog
Public-Law Litigation at a Crossroads: Article III Standing and ‘Tester’ Plaintiffs
Rachel Bayefsky (University of Virginia), Public-Law Litigation at a Crossroads: Article III Standing and 'Tester' Plaintiffs (Va. Pub. L. and Legal Theory, Research Paper No. 2023-64) (2023):An upcoming Supreme Court…
Inside Class Actions
Eleventh Circuit Updates Its Article III Standing Analysis
By Jeffrey Huberman, Andrew Soukup
This blog previously covered the Eleventh Circuit’s July 2022 decision in Drazen v. Pinto, which held that all class members must have Article III standing in order to receive individual…
Paul W. Mollica Federal Courts Blog
Don’t Make A Federal Case Out Of It: Seventh Circuit Considers A Lawsuit For $3.95
In Mack v. Resurgent Capital Servs., L.P., No. 21-2792 (7th Cir. June 7, 2023), the Seventh Circuit reverses and remands a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) lawsuit brought to…
TCPA Defense Force Blog
Does a Single Call to a Cellphone Meet the Concrete Injury Requirement? The Drazen Decision is Forthcoming
By meg-corrywbd-us-com-meg-corry
The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida recently stayed Simpson v. J.G. Wentworth Co.1 in light of the Eleventh Circuit's pending en banc decision in Drazen v. Pinto.2…
Consumer Financial Services Law Monitor
Washington Federal Court Rejects <em>Hunstein</em>; Holds Article III Standing Exists in FDCPA Letter-Vendor Claim
By Joshua Howell, Stefanie Jackman
Nearly two years after the Supreme Court's 2021 decision in Transunion v. Ramirez, courts and litigants continue to grapple with standing issues in Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) cases…
Class Defense Blog
The importance of scrutinizing standing to seek injunctive relief in defending or settling false-advertising suits
By Archis A. Parasharami, Daniel Jones, Kevin Ranlett, Adam Hudes
State consumer-protection statutes frequently authorize claims for class-wide injunctive relief; notably, California courts have fashioned a similar remedy allowing for injunctions on behalf of the “general public.” Plaintiffs bringing class…
Consumer Financial Services Law Monitor
Recent Trends in Article III Standing
By Jonathan Floyd, Meagan Mihalko, Chris Willis
Please join Troutman Pepper Partner Chris Willis and his colleagues Jonathan Floyd and Meagan Mihalko as they discuss recent trends in Article III standing in the federal courts. The trio…
Inside Class Actions
Eleventh Circuit Analyzes Article III Standing in Class Action Settlement Context
The Eleventh Circuit recently addressed two aspects of Article III standing relevant to class action settlements: the standing of a class member to object, and the standing of class representatives…