Topic
Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals
929 published works
Supreme Court Update
Bostock v. Clayton County (No. 17-1618), Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California (No. 18-587), U.S. Forest Service v. Cowpasture River Preservation Association (No. 18-1584), Andrus v. Texas (18-9674)
By Tadhg Dooley, David R. Roth
The blocks are finally busting this week at One First Street[’s internet server], with four new decisions, including two of the most anticipated of the term. On Monday, in Bostock…
ImmigrationProf Blog
DACA Victory at Supreme Court Is Precarious at Best
Ediberto Roman, Carrie Rosenbaum and Geoffrey Hoffman in commentary in Newsweek call for caution in the wake of the Supreme Court's decision yesterday:"Yesterday, the Supreme Court rejected President Trump's plan…
Subject to Inquiry
U.S. Supreme Court Determines Action to Rescind DACA was Arbitrary and Capricious
By Matthew Orso, Jacquelyn Stone
On June 18, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a long-awaited decision regarding the Department of Homeland Security’s (“DHS”) choice to rescind the immigration program Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals…
Through The Immigration Lens
A Win for Dreamers: Supreme Court Rejects Bid to end DACA
Seyfarth Synopsis: The Supreme Court allows DACA to proceed on the grounds that DHS did not meet the regulatory Administrative Procedures Act requirements in rescinding the program. The Court did…
Ogletree Deakins Insights
DACA Survives: SCOTUS Blocks Trump Administration Bid to End Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Program
By By: Caroline S. Page, Curtis Y. Chow, Publisher, Lee Gibbs Depret-Bixio
On June 18, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in DHS v. Regents of the University of California, No. 18-587, effectively blocking the U.S. Department…
ImmigrationProf Blog
DACA, College and University Students, and the Future of U.S. Immigration Law
At the end of the Term when the Supreme Court hands down its most controversial rulings, the Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision, with the a majority opinion by Chief…
ImmigrationProf Blog
Guest Post: Minyao Wang, The Supreme Court Decides DACA Rescission Case on Administrative Law Grounds, Avoids Deciding Lawfulness of DACA
Guest Post: The Supreme Court Decides DACA Rescission Case on Administrative Law Grounds, Avoids Deciding Lawfulness of DACA by Minyao WangYesterday, the U.S Supreme Court by a vote of 5…
ImmigrationProf Blog
Responses to Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California
The Supreme Court's decision in Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California is in the books.President Trump was not pleased with the decision and called for…
The Mobile Workforce
Supreme Court Thwarts Trump Administration’s Attempt to Dismantle DACA
By Elizabeth (Liz) Espín Stern, Paul W. Virtue
Today, the Supreme Court—in a 5-4 decision—invalidated the Trump Administration’s rescission of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (“DACA”) program, which provides protection against deportation and work authorization for 700,000…
Hot Off The Hill
Supreme Court of the United States Upholds DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals)
In a 5-4 decision written by Chief Justice John Roberts on Department of Homeland Security et al vs. Regents of the University of California, the Supreme Court held that the DACA…