Skip to main content

Topic

Equitable Relief

115 published works

  1. Roberts Disability Law Blog

    Fifth Circuit Affirms Denial of Retirement Benefits and Dismissal of ERISA-estoppel Claim

    By Michelle Roberts

    In Clark v. Certainteed Salaried Pension Plan, et al., No. 20-30059, __F.App’x__, 2021 WL 2620557 (5th Cir. June 24, 2021), Plaintiff-Appellant Terry Clark sought retirement benefits under the Saint-Gobain Retirement…

  2. Consumer Finance Monitor

    FTC Acting Chairwoman Slaughter responds to trade group’s letter on proposed amendments to FTC Act Section 13(b)

    By Ballard CFS Group

    Earlier this week, FTC Acting Chairwoman Rebecca Kelly Slaughter sent a letter to the Chair and Ranking Member of the House Commerce Committee responding to a letter sent to the…

  3. Boom: The ERISA Law Blog

    ERISA 502(a)(3) Claims: Congress Never Thought the Phrase “Equitable Relief” Included Money Damages

    By Mike Reilly

    You know that a claimant must exhaust administrative remedies before filing a suit. But is an appeal “optional” when the denial letter says that claimant “may request a second level…

  4. Drug & Device Law

    Possibly Off-the-Wall Ideas Triggered by Recent Cases

    By Bexis

    One of the intriguing things about cases decided by a jurisdiction’s highest court is that pronouncements by such courts can often have far-reaching implications.  Sometimes they pan out, as the…

  5. AD-ttorneys Law Blog

    SCOTUS: No Equitable Monetary Relief for FTC Under § 13(b)

    By Linda A. Goldstein, Matthew Renick

    Well, the buck stops here (for now). Last week, in AMG Capital Management, LLC v. Federal Trade Commission, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade…

  6. Supreme Court Update

    Jones v. Mississippi (No. 18-1259), AMG Capital Management LLC v. FTC (No. 19-508), Carr v. Saul (No. 19-1442)

    By Tadhg Dooley, David R. Roth

    Last Thursday, the Court issued three decisions in argued cases. In Jones v. Mississippi (No. 18-1259), a heavily divided Court pared back its prior decision in Miller v. Alabama (2012),…

  7. Cov Financial Services

    Supreme Court Ruling Complicates FTC’s Ability to Obtain Consumer Redress

    By Covington Financial Services

    On April 22, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in AMG Capital Management v. Federal Trade Commission that § 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) Act does not authorize the…

  8. Privacy & Information Security Law Blog

    Supreme Court Rules FTC Cannot Rely on “Injunction” Provision to Obtain Equitable Monetary Relief

    By Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

    As reported on Hunton’s Retail Law Blog, on April 22, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held in a highly-anticipated case, AMG Capital Management, LLC v. FTC, that the Federal…

  9. Hunton Retail Law Resource

    In a Rebuke to Longstanding FTC Approach, Supreme Court Rules FTC Cannot Rely on “Injunction” Provision to Obtain Equitable Monetary Relief

    By Phyllis H. Marcus

    In 1973, Congress amended the FTC Act by adding §13(b), giving the Federal Trade Commission equitable powers to remediate any violation of any law under its purview.  Using that power,…

  10. Ad Law Access

    Supreme Court Finds Section 13(b) Does Not Allow for Monetary Remedies

    By John E. Villafranco

    This morning, the Supreme Court released its long-awaited opinion in AMG Capital Management v. FTC. Judge Breyer issued the decision for a unanimous Court. As we had predicted following oral…