Skip to main content

Topic

Expert Testimony

566 published works

  1. Tort Talk

    Fair Scope of the Expert Report Rule Does Not Apply to Treating Doctors

    By Daniel Cummins

    In the case of Merrifield v. Bonacuse, No. 16-CV-3420 (C.P. Lacka. Co. Dec. 8, 2021 Nealon, J.), the court addressed the scope of expert testimony for trial as being beyond…

  2. Tort Talk

    Federal Court Addresses Daubert Motion Relative to Expert Testimony and Motion for Summary Judgment in Products Case

    By Daniel Cummins

    In the case of DiDonato v. Black & Decker (U.S.), Inc., No. 20-CV-4425-JMY (E.D. Pa. Feb. 9, 2022 Younge, J.), the court denied a Motion for Summary Judgment and a…

  3. Tort Talk

    Expert Reports May Not Be Required of Plaintiffs In Cases Where Causation is Obvious

    By Daniel Cummins

    In some personal injury cases, the relationship of a plaintiff's injury to an alleged act may be so obvious that expert testimony on causation may not be necessary.  Such was the…

  4. Expert Institute Insights

    How to Give Expert Testimony: What New Experts Need to Know When Testifying at Trial

    By Carolyn Casey J.D.

    There are a few guidelines to learn about the mechanics of delivering your expertise in a courtroom setting. Following these tips will also help you present yourself as a credible…

  5. Product Perspective: Complex Tort & Product Law

    Cumulative Exposure Theories by Any Other Name Would Still Be Excluded: Illinois Court Requires Evidence of Length and Amount of Asbestos Exposure

    By Tim Larkin, Jonah Hall, Maureen Jenner

    Under the now widely-adopted Daubert standard, courts evaluate expert testimony based on the principles and methodology underlying the expert witness’s opinion. Admissibility of expert testimony is not governed by whether…

  6. EvidenceProf Blog

    Federal Rule of Evidence 702 Proposed Amendments: Bringing Expert Analysis Under Consistent Judicial Scrutiny

    By Colin Miller

    Tomorrow at 1:00pm, I will be presenting as part of the CLE Panel: Federal Rule of Evidence 702 Proposed Amendments: Bringing Expert Analysis Under Consistent Judicial Scrutiny. Here at the…

  7. Florida Construction Legal Updates

    JUST BECAUSE I MAY BE AN “EXPERT” DOES NOT MEAN I AM GIVING EXPERT TESTIMONY

    By David Adelstein

    On a construction project, it’s hard to argue that the involved parties — whether an architect, engineer, contractor, subcontractor, developer, etc. — are not experts in their field, i.e., they…

  8. EvidenceProf Blog

    Eleventh Circuit Opinion Raises Questions Under Rule 704

    By Colin Miller

    Federal Rule of Evidence 704 provides that (a) In General — Not Automatically Objectionable. An opinion is not objectionable just because it embraces an ultimate issue.(b) Exception. In a criminal case, an expert…

  9. EvidenceProf Blog

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals Finds Daubert Hearing Didn’t Need to be Held in Arson Retrial

    By Colin Miller

    Federal Rule of Evidence 702 (like many state counterparts), provides thatA witness who is qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify in the form…

  10. Drug & Device Law

    You Gotta Have Methodology: Expert’s Ipse Dixit Opinion Excluded in C.D. Cal. Hernia Mesh Case

    By Rachel B. Weil

    We are headed to New York on Monday for the A.C.I. Drug and Medical Device Conference.  We love this conference – we always see so many old friends and former…