Skip to main content

Topic

Obviousness

205 published works

  1. PTABWatch

    Teaching Away for Dummies

    By Marshall Gerstein

    In Meiresonne v. Google, Inc., No. 2016-1755 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 7, 2017), the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB’s final written decision in IPR2014-01188 that the challenged claims in U.S. Patent…

  2. PTAB Law Blog

    How Many References Is Too Many for Challenging a Patent on Obviousness?

    By Soumya P. Panda, Mark T. Rawls, Caitlin M. Wilmot

    The PTAB does not appear to have weighed in, one way or another, on the question of how many references is too many for an obviousness challenge under 35 U.S.C.…

  3. PTABWatch

    Secondary Considerations of Non-obviousness Retain Some Vigor

    By William K. Merkel, Ph.D.

    IPR 2015-01651 involved a dispute over the obviousness of claims in U.S. Patent No. 8,551,271 owned by Crown Packaging Technology, Inc. and drawn to a grooved crown bottle cap with…

  4. Prosecution First Blog

    In re Ethicon: Connecting Seemingly Unrelated Dots May Support An Obviousness Conclusion

    By Clara N. Jimenez

    Read more

  5. Prosecution First Blog

    In re Ethicon: Connecting Seemingly Unrelated Dots May Support An Obviousness Conclusion

    By Clara N. Jimenez

    Read more

  6. PTABWatch

    Federal Circuit Finds Portion of Board’s Obviousness Decision Supported

    By Kate Nuehring Su

    In Slot Speaker Techs., Inc. v. Apple Inc., Nos. 2015-2038, 2015-2039 (Fed. Cir. February 17, 2017) (non-prec.), the Federal Circuit affirmed a portion of the PTAB’s decision in an IPR…

  7. PTABWatch

    Federal Circuit Affirms Cancellation of Claims Based on Analogous Art

    By Matthew R. Carey

    In Unwired Planet, LLC v. Google Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB’s IPR decision that the challenged claims are invalid as obvious and dismissed the PTAB’s CBM review as…

  8. Intellectual Property Law Blog

    You’re So Vague: Federal Circuit Sends IPR Decision Back to PTAB for More Thorough Analysis

    By Daniel C. Kloke

    In a precedential decision, the Federal Circuit reaffirmed that the Patent Trial and Appeal’s Board (PTAB) is required to explicitly state motivations to combine prior-art references in claim rejections for…

  9. IP Intelligence

    When Obvious Isn’t Obvious: Personal Web Technologies

    By Brendan Clark

    On Valentine’s Day 2017, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s conclusions of obviousness in Personal Web Technologies, LLC due to insufficient…

  10. Intellectual Property Law Blog

    Suing The United States Government For Patent Infringement And Defending Against A Claim Of Obviousness

    By Amy Harwath, Bradley Graveline

    A patentee may bring patent infringement claims against the United States government pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1498, in which Congress waived the sovereign immunity of the United States against…