Skip to main content

Topic

Obviousness

205 published works

  1. PTABWatch

    Failure To Identify The Difference Makes A Difference

    By Kevin D. Hogg

    There have been a few short articles floating around over the past few years that list the top (usually four or five) mistakes that petitioners have made to doom their…

  2. BioLoquitur

    Federal Circuit Affirms Holding of Obviousness of Claims Covering Warner Chilcott’s Osteoporosis Drug, Altevia®

    By Dean L. Fanelli, Ph.D.

    In Warner Chilcott v. Teva, the Federal Circuit used the appellant’s claim limitation, as defined in the specification, to uphold the district court’s finding that the claims of two patents…

  3. Patent Challenges

    Federal Circuit rules that PTAB failed to adequately describe its reasoning for obviousness finding

    By NRF Digital Team

    In a recent decision vacating the PTAB’s obviousness findings in an IPR, the Federal Circuit set forth criteria necessary to support future obviousness findings. Cutsforth, Inc. v. MotivePower, Inc., No.…

  4. PTABWatch

    PTAB Revises Claim Construction in Final Written Decision, But Still Finds Claims Invalid

    By Heather R. Kissling

    On January 11, 2016, the PTAB issued a final written decision in ABS Global, Inc. et al. v. XY, LLC, IPR2014-01161, holding claims 1 and 3 of U.S Patent No.…

  5. Prosecution First Blog

    Ex Parte Quist:  Evidence and Legal Conclusions of Obviousness Must Be Reviewed Anew by the Board

    By Michelle Pacholec

    PTAB Decision: Ex parte Quist, Appeal No. 2008-001183 (June 2, 2010)Read more

  6. Prosecution First Blog

    Ex Parte Quist:  Evidence and Legal Conclusions of Obviousness Must Be Reviewed Anew by the Board

    By Michelle Pacholec

    PTAB Decision: Ex parte Quist, Appeal No. 2008-001183 (June 2, 2010)Read more

  7. Patent Challenges

    Federal Circuit holds that PTAB is not bound by findings made in Institution Decisions

    By Andrew Liddell (US)

    A unanimous Federal Circuit panel recently affirmed the PTAB’s judgment holding that the Petitioner failed to satisfy its burden of proving that the challenged claims of the patent were obvious.…

  8. PTABWatch

    Petitioner Blows Smoke with Late-Filed Declaration

    By Michael R. Weiner

    In Redline Detection, LLC v Star Envirotech, Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed a PTAB final written decision that the petitioner failed to show that the challenged claims were obvious, and…

  9. BioLoquitur

    Secondary Indicia Must be Connected to “Novel Features” of the Claims

    By Seyfarth Shaw LLP

    In two recent companion cases, the Federal Circuit upheld the Board’s decision that claims related to administering a natural stereoisomer to treat symptoms of folate deficiency would have been obvious.

  10. Patents Post-Grant

    CAFC Sides with PTAB’s Rejection of Secondary Indicia Nexus

    By Scott McKeown

    CAFC Outlines Most Common Faults in Secondary Indicia Showing The efficacy of objective evidence of non-obviousness (i.e., secondary indicia) hinges on the ability to demonstrate a "nexus" between the evidence…