Skip to main content

Topic

Patent Validity

197 published works

  1. Journal of Business & Intellectual Property Law

    SCOTUS Patently Denies the U.S. Postal Service’s Personhood

    By Journal of Business & Intellectual Property Law at WFU

    By: Mary Jasperse, Summer Blogger On June 10, 2019, the Supreme Court ruled that federal government agencies do not qualify as a “person” under the 2011 Leahy-Smith America Invents Act…

  2. IP Intelligence

    Return Mail May Make COFC More Attractive To Patent Holders

    By BakerHostetler

    This article was first published by Law360 on June 19, 2019. Authored by: William Bergmann and Michael Anderson In 2011 the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act created three new types of…

  3. Government Contracts Law

    The Supreme Court Limits Government Agencies’ Ability to Deflect Infringement Claims Through the PTO: A Preamble for Government Contractors

    By McCarter & English

    Here’s another reminder of limitations that exist when there is a third party claim of infringement against a U.S. Government agency. In such a case, the patent owner must sue in…

  4. The IP Law Blog

    Supreme Court: Federal Government Cannot Challenge Patents in PTAB

    By Audrey A Millemann

    The validity of a patent can be challenged in four different types of proceedings: ex parte reexamination, inter partes review, post grant review, and covered business method review. An ex…

  5. Subscript Law Blog

    Helsinn Healthcare v. Teva USA (Decision January 22, 2019)

    By Clint Mehall

    Argument: December 4, 2018Decision: January 22, 2019Petitioner Brief: Helsinn Healthcare S.A.Respondent Brief: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.,Court below: Federal Circuit Court of AppealsSupreme Court reinforces the longstanding rule that even a non-public…

  6. PTABWatch

    Trade Show Publication Dooms Patent in IPR Appeal Despite Contrary Decision in ITC Appeal

    By Heather R. Kissling

    Inter partes review not only provides a faster and cheaper way to challenge patent validity, but also expands the Patent Office’s ability to develop law on esoteric issues relating to…

  7. PTABWatch

    IPR Estoppel Does Not Apply to ITC Investigative Staff

    By Julianne M. Hartzell

    Judge Cheney of the United States International Trade Commission held that ITC Investigative Staff are not estopped from asserting invalidity of a patent based upon prior art that was previously…

  8. The IP Law Blog

    IP Challenges Again Take the Stage at the U.S. Supreme Court

    By Jo Dale Carothers

    Intellectual property disputes will again take their place on stage at the U.S. Supreme Court this term when the court addresses at least two IP questions.  1.  Can the government…

  9. Patents Post-Grant

    Invalidity Contentions as IPR Estoppel Markers

    By Scott McKeown, Scott McKeown Wolf Greenfield

    Invalidity Contentions Serve as Estoppel Benchmark A Patent Owner may only avail itself of an IPR estoppel defense in court upon demonstrating that a competent prior art search would have uncovered the…

  10. PTABWatch

    Federal Circuit Puts Nail in Coffin For Petitioner’s Case Challenging Casket Patent

    By Marshall Gerstein

    In Matthews International Corporation v. Vandor Corporation, No. 2017-1889 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 27, 2018) (non-precedential), the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB’s final written decision to uphold the claims of Vandor’s…