Skip to main content

Topic

Standing

1,072 published works

  1. MoFo ReEnforcement: The Enforcement Blog

    The Supreme Court’s Spokeo Decision: Concrete Shoes For Consumer Class Actions?

    By Angela Kleine, Jim McCabe, Ben Patterson

    Today the Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins. The decision takes on a hot topic in consumer class action law today—what must a plaintiff…

  2. Consumer Financial Services Review

    Supreme Court Holds in Spokeo that Plaintiffs Must Show “Real” Harm to Have Standing to Sue for Statutory Damages

    By Kris D. Kully, Steven M. Kaplan

    Today, the Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins.  In a win for the business community, the Court held that plaintiffs can’t satisfy Article III’s injury-in-fact…

  3. Class Defense Blog

    Supreme Court Holds in Spokeo that Plaintiffs Must Show “Real” Harm to Have Standing to Sue for Statutory Damages

    By Andrew J. Pincus, Archis A. Parasharami, John Nadolenco, Adam Hudes

    The Supreme Court today issued its decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins (pdf), a closely-watched case presenting the question whether Article III’s “injury-in-fact” requirement for standing to sue in federal court…

  4. Class Actions Insider

    Spokeo v. Robins Supreme Court Opinion: What Is Concrete Harm?

    By Wystan Ackerman

    Today the Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, addressing whether the plaintiff had standing to sue in a putative class action brought under the Fair…

  5. Class Action & Mass Torts

    Spokeo v. Robins: The U.S. Supreme Court Finds Concrete Injury Is Required Under Article III But Remands Back To The Ninth Circuit

    By Laura Maechtlen

    By Gerald L. Maatman, Jr., Pamela Q. Devata, Robert T. Szyba, and Ephraim J. Pierre Seyfarth Synopsis: In deciding Spokeo v. Robins, the U.S. Supreme Court reaffirmed that plaintiffs seeking…

  6. Marks, Works, and Secrets

    En Banc Reconsideration Sought in FLANAX Case

    By Ira S. Sacks, Rachel B. Rudensky

    Belmora LLC filed a petition for reconsideration en banc of the Fourth Circuit's FLANAX decision in Belmora LLC v Bayer Consumer Care AG, Appeal No. 15-1335 (4th Cir. March 23, 2016).…

  7. Constitutional Law Prof Blog

    Court Remands Spokeo, on Concrete Harm and Standing

    By Steven D. Schwinn

    Steven D. Schwinn, John Marshall Law SchoolThe Supreme Court today vacated and remanded Spokeo v. Robins, the case testing whether Congress can create standing for a plaintiff who suffered no…

  8. Business and Commercial

    Only a Bona Fide Patron of A Business Can Bring an ADA Suit, Maryland Court Holds

    By Minh N. Vu

    Seyfarth Synopsis:  In a refreshing breath of fresh air, a federal judge holds that an intent to return as a "tester" does not give a plaintiff standing to sue under…

  9. Class Action & Mass Torts

    Reading The Tea Leaves – How Will The U.S. Supreme Court Decide Spokeo?

    By David Cannon, Liên Payne

    While the U.S. Supreme Court has issued decisions on two of its major class action cases this term, Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez and Tyson Foods v. Bouaphekeo (see January 20,…

  10. ImmigrationProf Blog

    The Notice and Comment Question in United States v. Texas

    By immigrationprof

    Much has been written about the standing issue before the U.S. Supreme Court in United States v. Texas.  However, if the Court finds that Texas and the other states have…